. 2026 Feb 20;55(8):1933–1953. doi: 10.1007/s13280-025-02335-1

Table 1.

Examples of typical feedback received from testing the draft version of the Wetland Wanderer Tool (WWT) in Adelaide, Australia, and subsequent updates made

Version 1	Feedback	Version 2
What is the quality of the views?	“This question is very subjective”	Can you see the wetland from within the site? Is the view impeded by anything?
How extensive is the path/trail	“This is unclear”	Deleted
Is access impacting habitat protection?	“I think this needs to be more clear”	Are there signs indicating human-induced threats to the area? Are there fences/barriers protecting or restricting access? Are there signs indicating why these fences/barriers are in place?

Version 1

Feedback

Version 2

What is the quality of the views?

“This question is very subjective”

Can you see the wetland from within the site?

Is the view impeded by anything?

How extensive is the path/trail

“This is unclear”

Deleted

Is access impacting habitat protection?

“I think this needs to be more clear”

Are there signs indicating human-induced threats to the area?

Are there fences/barriers protecting or restricting access?

Are there signs indicating why these fences/barriers are in place?