TABLE 1.
HP monotherapy comparative studies.
| HP intervention | Comparator | Study design | Sample size (n) | Follow-up duration | Main efficacy findings | Comparative interpretation | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harpadol® 2,610 mg/day (harpagoside 57 mg) | Diacerein 100 mg/day | RCT | 122 | 16 weeks | Both groups demonstrated reductions in pain and Lequesne Index scores; lower rescue diclofenac use observed in the HP group | Symptomatic improvement appeared comparable under study conditions; long-term comparative efficacy remains uncertain | Chantre et al. (2000) |
| Doloteffin® 2,400 mg/day (harpagoside 60 mg) | Rofecoxib 12.5 mg/day | RCT, DB | 88 | 6 weeks | Pain reduction and HAQ improvement reported in both groups; higher proportion of pain-free patients in the HP group | Some outcomes favored HP; however, direct equivalence with NSAIDs cannot be established because of limited sample size and study duration | Chrubasik et al. (2003) |
| Teltonal® 960 mg/day | Meloxicam 15 mg/day | RCT, AC | 60 | 8 weeks | Similar reductions in VAS and WOMAC scores were observed between groups | No significant between-group difference was reported; interpretation limited by small sample size | Farpour et al. (2021) |
| HP extract 6,000 mg/day (harpagoside 50 mg) | Placebo | RCT, DB, PC | 109 | 4 weeks | Increased proportion of pain-free patients and improvement in Arhus Index compared with placebo | Findings suggest short-term symptomatic benefit versus placebo | Chrubasik et al. (1996) |
Abbreviations: VAS, visual analogue scale; WOMAC, Western ontario and mcMaster universities osteoarthritis index; RCT, randomized controlled trial; DB, Double-blind; AC, Active-controlled; PC, Placebo-controlled; HP, harpagophytum procumbens; MCID, minimal clinically important difference.