Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 17;17:1839470. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1839470

TABLE 1.

HP monotherapy comparative studies.

HP intervention Comparator Study design Sample size (n) Follow-up duration Main efficacy findings Comparative interpretation References
Harpadol® 2,610 mg/day (harpagoside 57 mg) Diacerein 100 mg/day RCT 122 16 weeks Both groups demonstrated reductions in pain and Lequesne Index scores; lower rescue diclofenac use observed in the HP group Symptomatic improvement appeared comparable under study conditions; long-term comparative efficacy remains uncertain Chantre et al. (2000)
Doloteffin® 2,400 mg/day (harpagoside 60 mg) Rofecoxib 12.5 mg/day RCT, DB 88 6 weeks Pain reduction and HAQ improvement reported in both groups; higher proportion of pain-free patients in the HP group Some outcomes favored HP; however, direct equivalence with NSAIDs cannot be established because of limited sample size and study duration Chrubasik et al. (2003)
Teltonal® 960 mg/day Meloxicam 15 mg/day RCT, AC 60 8 weeks Similar reductions in VAS and WOMAC scores were observed between groups No significant between-group difference was reported; interpretation limited by small sample size Farpour et al. (2021)
HP extract 6,000 mg/day (harpagoside 50 mg) Placebo RCT, DB, PC 109 4 weeks Increased proportion of pain-free patients and improvement in Arhus Index compared with placebo Findings suggest short-term symptomatic benefit versus placebo Chrubasik et al. (1996)

Abbreviations: VAS, visual analogue scale; WOMAC, Western ontario and mcMaster universities osteoarthritis index; RCT, randomized controlled trial; DB, Double-blind; AC, Active-controlled; PC, Placebo-controlled; HP, harpagophytum procumbens; MCID, minimal clinically important difference.