Table 13.
Ablation study results on test set (5-fold cross-validation).
| Configuration | Acc. (%) |
(%) |
|---|---|---|
| Full BATL | 93.33 ± 0.94 | – |
| Component ablations | ||
| w/o biomechanical constraints | 85.55 ± 1.83 | ![]() |
| w/o phase discovery | 88.89 ± 1.47 | ![]() |
| w/o dual-stream fusion | 84.44 ± 2.11 | ![]() |
| Individual constraint ablations | ||
w/o
|
90.00 ± 1.56 | ![]() |
w/o
|
91.11 ± 1.34 | ![]() |
w/o
|
92.22 ± 1.02 | ![]() |
| Architecture variants | ||
| Replace BiLSTM with GRU | 91.11 ± 1.45 | ![]() |
| Replace BiLSTM with transformer | 92.22 ± 1.28 | ![]() |
| Single-layer LSTM | 88.89 ± 1.67 | ![]() |
| Training strategy ablations | ||
| w/o data agmentation | 86.67 ± 2.34 | ![]() |
| w/o dropout | 85.55 ± 2.45 | ![]() |
| w/o weight decay | 87.78 ± 1.98 | ![]() |
| w/o class confusion aug | 91.11 ± 1.23 | ![]() |
















