Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 22;17:1835178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1835178

Table 3.

Phototherapy for insomnia and disturbed circadian rhythm.

Therapy Evaluation item Evaluation results
Bright light therapy Representative Study Design Literature Population N RCT Placebo effect excluded Objective biomarkers Follow-up
(112) (c) poststroke insomnia patients 56 Yes Yes Yes No
(113) (a) diagnosed by DSM-5 14 Yes No Yes No
(114) (c) post-acute coronary syndrome patients 15 Yes No No No
Main Clinical Findings & Safety Improves subjective sleep quality and insomnia. Modestly increases total sleep time, reduces night awakenings, and slightly boosts sleep efficiency (109, 111, 120). Effects on sleep latency are mixed. Generally safe; side effects are mild and transient (headache, eye strain, glare).
Limitations Small/short trials; inconsistent light parameters (timing/dose/spectrum); limited sham controls and long-term data; mixed objective outcomes.
Evidence Level Emerging. Small controlled studies suggest short-term subjective benefits, but evidence is limited by small samples, indirect populations, limited sham controls, and inconsistent objective outcomes.
Infrared
LED light
Representative Study Design Literature Population N RCT Placebo effect excluded Objective biomarkers Follow-up
(115) (b) adults with subclinical sleep complaints 30 Yes Yes Yes No
(116) (d) shift-working nurses 64 Yes No No No
(117) (b) older adults 59 Yes No Yes No
(119) (e) healthy men 24 Yes Yes Yes No
Main Clinical Findings & Safety Small indirect/subclinical RCTs suggest subjective benefits, but objective and insomnia-specific efficacy remains uncertain. Short-term use appears well tolerated.
Limitations Limited by small samples, no long-term follow-up, and most lacking placebo controls. All evaluated indirect populations rather than diagnosed clinical insomnia.
Evidence Level Exploratory. Multiple RCTs suggest subjective benefits and good safety, but the evidence is downgraded due to indirect populations, small sample sizes, absent follow-up, inconsistent objective outcomes, and high risk of bias from inadequate placebo controls.
40Hz flickering light Representative Study Design Literature Population N RCT Placebo effect excluded Objective biomarkers Follow-up
(107) (e) sleep-deprived rats 32 No No Yes No
(108) (b) children
(e) healthy adults
(e) mice
49 children, 16 adults, mice No No Yes No
Main Clinical Findings & Safety 40Hz light promotes sleep in children with insomnia and alertness in sleep-deprived rats, with no adverse ocular or systemic effects.
Limitations Relies on preclinical models and one uncontrolled pediatric pilot study. Lacks sham-controlled RCTs, long-term follow-up, and direct validation in adult insomnia disorder.
Evidence Level Exploratory. Based only on preclinical data and one uncontrolled pediatric pilot study; lacks adult RCTs and long-term validation.