Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2026 Mar;318(3):e251404. doi: 10.1148/radiol.251404

Table 3:

Parameters Evaluated in Univariable and Multivariable Analysis and Their Performance Metrics in the Differentiation of Indolent Versus Aggressive Renal Neoplasms

Analysis and Model AUC P Value* Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Univariable analysis
 ADC 0.38 (0.00, 0.73) … 39 64
 RBF 0.62 (0.08, 1.00) .20 75 59
 T1 0.39 (0.00, 0.72) .54 39 68
 T2 0.83 (0.50, 1.00) .02 82 83
Multivariable analysis
 ADC + RBF 0.51 (0.00, 0.90) … 60 59
 T1 + T2 0.89 (0.60, 1.00) .06 86 93
 ADC + RBF + T1 0.42 (0.00, 0.80) .50 49 57
 ADC + RBF + T2 0.75 (0.38, 1.00) .13 80 73
 ADC + RBF + T1 + T2 0.83 (0.50, 1.00) .07 79 87

Note.—Data in parentheses are 95% CIs. MR fingerprinting–derived T1 and T2 relaxation times provided complementary information, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 in this analysis. ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient, RBF = renal blood flow.

*

P values for the AUC comparison are presented, using the ADC-only model as the reference for the univariable analysis and the ADC + RBF model as the reference for the multivariable analysis.