Table 6.
Comparison of foramen rotundum canal LENGTH measurements across studies
| Study | Year | Method | Sample | Parameter | Mean (mm) | SD (mm) | Range (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present study | 2026 | CBCT | 44 pts (88 FR) | Overall | 4.07 | 1.78 | 0.75–9.12 |
| Right side | 3.81 | 1.77 | 0.75–7.52 | ||||
| Left side | 4.33 | 1.77 | 1.00-9.12 | ||||
| Ginsberg et al. [11] | 1994 | HR-CT (1.5 mm) | 123 patients | Canal length | 3.4 | — | — |
| Amin et al. [2]* | 2010 | Endoscopic | 5 heads + 4 skulls | V2 canal | 12.45 | 1.60 | 11.0-15.5 |
| Unver Dogan et al. [24] | 2014 | Direct measurements | 44 dry skulls + 18 cadavers | Canal length | 4.48/4.36 | 1.15/0.66 | 3.93–5.01 |
SD = standard deviation; HR-CT = high-resolution computed tomography; PPF = pterygopalatine fossa; MCF = middle cranial fossa
*Amin et al. [2]: Their V2 canal represents an operational endoscopic construct (surgical drilling corridor from PPF to MCF), not a standardised morphometric FR definition. Measurement likely extended beyond strict osseous canal boundaries. Small sample size (n = 10 sides), mixed material (formalin cadavers + dry skulls), no intra-/interobserver reliability data. Values should not be directly compared with anatomical FR canal length measurements