Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 6;48(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00276-026-03930-x

Table 6.

Comparison of foramen rotundum canal LENGTH measurements across studies

Study Year Method Sample Parameter Mean (mm) SD (mm) Range (mm)
Present study 2026 CBCT 44 pts (88 FR) Overall 4.07 1.78 0.75–9.12
Right side 3.81 1.77 0.75–7.52
Left side 4.33 1.77 1.00-9.12
Ginsberg et al. [11] 1994 HR-CT (1.5 mm) 123 patients Canal length 3.4 — —
Amin et al. [2]* 2010 Endoscopic 5 heads + 4 skulls V2 canal 12.45 1.60 11.0-15.5
Unver Dogan et al. [24] 2014 Direct measurements 44 dry skulls + 18 cadavers Canal length 4.48/4.36 1.15/0.66 3.93–5.01

SD = standard deviation; HR-CT = high-resolution computed tomography; PPF = pterygopalatine fossa; MCF = middle cranial fossa

*Amin et al. [2]: Their V2 canal represents an operational endoscopic construct (surgical drilling corridor from PPF to MCF), not a standardised morphometric FR definition. Measurement likely extended beyond strict osseous canal boundaries. Small sample size (n = 10 sides), mixed material (formalin cadavers + dry skulls), no intra-/interobserver reliability data. Values should not be directly compared with anatomical FR canal length measurements