Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 6;48(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00276-026-03930-x

Table 7.

Comparison of foramen rotundum morphometric studies

Study Method Sample FR dimensions (mm) Asymmetry/Difference TN association
Ginsberg et al. [11] CT (1.5 mm) 123 patients Length: 3.4 None observed Not assessed
Erbagci et al. [9] CT (0.8 mm) 21 TN / 24 controls TN: R 3.04 × 3.2, L 2.8 × 2.9; Controls: R 2.4 × 3.2, L 2.5 × 3.1 Not significant (p > 0.05) No association
Liu et al. [16] CT (0.6 mm) 21 TN / 30 controls TN: pain 2.50 ± 0.40, non-pain 2.71 ± 0.45; Controls: R 2.68 ± 0.38, L 2.56 ± 0.41 Tendency only (p = 0.09) Possible in NVC-negative cases
Kastamoni et al. [15] 3D-CT (1 mm) 19 TN / 158 controls TN painful: L 1.78 ± 0.42, W 1.77 ± 0.46; Controls: L 2.14 ± 0.47, W 2.05 ± 0.48 Significant (p = 0.001 L; p = 0.011 W) Significant association
Sönmez et al. [21] CT modified planes (1 mm) 34 TN / 34 controls TN: L 1.49 ± 0.39, W 1.11 ± 0.39; Controls: L 2.38 ± 0.55, W 1.80 ± 0.48 Highly significant (p < 0.001) Strong association
Ismail et al. [13] CT (0.6 mm) 57 TN / 40 controls TN: W 0.21–0.26; Controls: W 0.25–0.28 (cm) Right narrower (ns); right-sided pain 50.9% Females narrower in TN (p < 0.001)

TN: trigeminal neuralgia; L: length; W: width; R: right; NVC: neurovascular compressions