Table 7.
Comparison of results from ablation experiments with random selection of negative samples across different models
| Method | Acc | Sen | Spe | Pre | MCC | AUC | AUPRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No_ass | 0.8293 | 0.8872 | 0.8047 | 0.8107 | 0.6125 | 0.9032 | 0.8196 |
| No_sim | 0.9437 | 0.9764 | 0.9247 | 0.9184 | 0.8375 | 0.9582 | 0.9085 |
| No_LA | 0.8562 | 0.9414 | 0.7948 | 0.8076 | 0.6457 | 0.9076 | 0.8969 |
| No_MAF | 0.9462 | 0.9815 | 0.8986 | 0.9155 | 0.8427 | 0.9562 | 0.9309 |
| No_CL | 0.9459 | 0.9749 | 0.9087 | 0.9176 | 0.8379 | 0.9574 | 0.9378 |
| CMV-GLA (Ours) | 0.9506 | 0.9882 | 0.9132 | 0.9194 | 0.8569 | 0.9662 | 0.9431 |
Bold values indicate the best performance among all compared methods for each metric