Table 8.
Comparison of results from ablation experiments with different models under negative sample selection strategy
| Method | Acc | Sen | Spe | Pre | MCC | AUC | AUPRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No_ass | 0.8397 | 0.9007 | 0.8094 | 0.8471 | 0.6724 | 0.9272 | 0.9257 |
| No_sim | 0.9546 | 0.9879 | 0.9461 | 0.9349 | 0.8573 | 0.9756 | 0.9679 |
| No_LA | 0.9465 | 0.9905 | 0.9472 | 0.9278 | 0.8356 | 0.9809 | 0.9768 |
| No_MAF | 0.9578 | 0.9864 | 0.9184 | 0.9372 | 0.8964 | 0.9824 | 0.9816 |
| No_CL | 0.9569 | 0.9846 | 0.9435 | 0.9437 | 0.8849 | 0.9847 | 0.9789 |
| CMV-GLA (Ours) | 0.9723 | 0.9929 | 0.9488 | 0.9511 | 0.9023 | 0.9889 | 0.9842 |
Bold values indicate the best performance among all compared methods for each metric