Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1972 Jul;18(1):133–140. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-133

Reponse-reinforcer independence and conventional extinction after fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules1

Kennon A Lattal
PMCID: PMC1333992  PMID: 16811610

Abstract

After training three albino rats to bar press during a multiple fixed-interval variable-interval schedule, the response-reinforcer dependency was simultaneously removed from both components, converting the schedule to multiple fixed-time variable-time. Response rates were reduced in both components under these conditions but the fixed-time schedule maintained relatively higher response rates with each rat. After reinstating the response-reinforcer dependency in both components, responding was conventionally extinguished by rendering the pellet dispenser inoperative. Responding rapidly decreased to near-zero levels. Differences in fixed and variable-time schedules in sustaining behavior are discussed in terms of differences in response rates at the time of reinforcer delivery. Similarities and differences between conventional extinction and schedules delivering response-independent reinforcers are also discussed.

Full text

PDF
133

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. APPEL J. B., HISS R. H. The discrimination of contingent from noncontingent reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Feb;55:37–39. doi: 10.1037/h0044613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards D. D., Peek V., Wolfe F. Independently delivered food decelerates fixed-ratio rates. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3):301–307. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GOLLUB L. R. THE RELATIONS AMONG MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE ON FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7:337–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hearst E. Multiple Schedules of Time-Correlated Reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jan;3(1):49–62. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KELLEHER R. T. Schedules of conditioned reinforcement during experimental extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4:1–5. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lattal K. A., Maxey G. C. Some effects of response independent reinforcers in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):225–231. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zeiler M. D. Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):405–414. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES