Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1973 Mar;19(2):331–344. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-331

Choice between concurrent schedules1

Ronald L Menlove, Marilynne Moffitt, Charles P Shimp
PMCID: PMC1334084  PMID: 16811668

Abstract

Six pigeons pecked for food in a three-key experiment. A subject at any time could choose the left or right key and receive reinforcement according to one two-key concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule of reinforcement, or it could peck the center key. A peck on the center key arranged the complementary two-key concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule on the left and right keys. The two different two-key concurrent schedules arranged reinforcements concurrently and were signalled by two different colors of key lights. Choice behavior in the presence of a given color conformed to the usual relationship in two-key concurrent schedules: the relative frequency of responding on a key approximately equalled the relative frequency of reinforcement on that key. Preference for a two-key concurrent schedule, which was equivalent to preference for a color, was measured by the percentage of all responses on the left and right keys in the presence of that color: this percentage approximately equalled the percentage of all reinforcements that were delivered in the presence of that color. Thus, choice between concurrent schedules conforms approximately to the same relationship as does choice between alternatives in a single concurrent schedule.

Full text

PDF
331

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chung S. H., Herrnstein R. J. Choice and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):67–74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Findley J. D. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):123–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Herbert E. W. Two-key concurrent responding: response-reinforcement dependencies and blackouts. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):61–70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moffitt M., Shimp C. P. Two-key concurrent paced variable-interval paced variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jul;16(1):39–49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pliskoff S. S., Shull R. L., Gollub L. R. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):271–284. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shimp C. P. Magnitude and frequency of reinforcement and frequencies of interresponse times. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):525–535. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shimp C. P. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):443–455. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shimp C. P. The concurrent reinforcement of two interresponse times: absolute rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jan;13(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shimp C. P. The concurrent reinforcement of two interresponse times: the relative frequency of an interresponse time equals its relative harmonic length. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):403–411. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shimp C. P. The reinforcement of four interresponse times in a two-alternative situation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Nov;16(3):385–399. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shimp C. P., Wheatley K. L. Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):205–210. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Staddon J. E. Spaced responding and choice: a preliminary analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):669–682. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stubbs D. A., Pliskoff S. S. Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):887–895. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES