Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1995 Mar;63(2):165–174. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-165

Pigeons' discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso

Shigeru Watanabe, Junko Sakamoto, Masumi Wakita
PMCID: PMC1334394  PMID: 16812755

Abstract

Pigeons successfully learned to discriminate color slides of paintings by Monet and Picasso. Following this training, they discriminated novel paintings by Monet and Picasso that had never been presented during the discrimination training. Furthermore, they showed generalization from Monet's to Cezanne's and Renoir's paintings or from Picasso's to Braque's and Matisse's paintings. These results suggest that pigeons' behavior can be controlled by complex visual stimuli in ways that suggest categorization. Upside-down images of Monet's paintings disrupted the discrimination, whereas inverted images of Picasso's did not. This result may indicate that the pigeons' behavior was controlled by objects depicted in impressionists' paintings but was not controlled by objects in cubists' paintings.

Keywords: stimulus control, concept, pattern discrimination, vision, key peck, pigeon

Full text

PDF
165

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Delius J. D., Habers G. Symmetry: can pigeons conceptualize it? Behav Biol. 1978 Mar;22(3):336–342. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6773(78)92411-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delius J. D., Hollard V. D. Orientation invariance of shape recognition in forebrain-lesioned pigeons. Behav Brain Res. 1987 Mar;23(3):251–259. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(87)90025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HERRNSTEIN R. J., LOVELAND D. H. COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON. Science. 1964 Oct 23;146(3643):549–551. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3643.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hernstein R. J., Loveland D. H., Cable C. Natural concepts in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1976 Oct;2(4):285–302. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.2.4.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Phelps M. T., Roberts W. A. Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia). J Comp Psychol. 1994 Jun;108(2):114–125. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. REYNOLDS G. S. Attention in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:203–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Watanabe S. Effects of ectostriatal lesions on natural concept, pseudoconcept, and artificial pattern discrimination in pigeons. Vis Neurosci. 1991 May;6(5):497–506. doi: 10.1017/s0952523800001346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES