Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 16;33(Pt 4):1074–1084. doi: 10.1107/S1600577526004923

Table 2. Comparison of results from one particular experiment (Roter et al., 2026) (with Inline graphic from Section 3.5) against calculated values for mass concentrations Inline graphic and detected number of fluorescent photons Inline graphic per pixel, along with the number of incident photons Inline graphic per pixel. As noted in Section 3.5, we did not have a direct measure of the air gap distance dg of equation (21); therefore, we show the ratio of experimental to theoretical incident photons Inline graphic for the sample dsdp = 0.98 cm from the detector plane, as well as for a revised value of dsdp = 4.5 cm (see Section S4 of the supporting information).

Element Inline graphic (µg cm−2) Inline graphic (photons per pixel) Inline graphic [equation (8)] (photons per pixel) (dsdp = 0.98 cm)(dg = 0.58 cm) Inline graphic (dsdp = 0.98 cm) (dg = 0.58 cm) Inline graphic (dsdp = 4.5 cm) (dg = 4.1 cm)
P 9.893 3.64 2.9 × 106 132.5 1.44
S 1.853 5.08 1.1 × 107 35.0 0.79
Ca 0.073 3.54 3.5 × 107 10.9 0.70
Fe 0.025 4.11 2.9 × 107 13.2 1.18
Ni 0.010 2.83 3.4 × 107 11.5 1.05