Table 8.

Moderated mediation results: PROCESS macro model 7 (N = 311; 5,000 Bootstrap Samples).

Conditional indirect effect	Moderator level	b Indirect	SE	95% BC CI	Sig.
Intrinsic → Supervision → Satisfaction (Moderated by Gender)	Male (coded 0)	0.06	0.02	[0.02, 0.11]	Yes ✓
	Female (coded 1)	0.14	0.03	[0.08, 0.21]	Yes ✓
Index of moderated mediation (IMM)		0.08	0.03	[0.02, 0.15]	Yes ✓
Extrinsic → Supervision → Satisfaction (Moderated by Job Level)	Staff/Specialist (coded 0)	0.19	0.04	[0.12, 0.27]	Yes ✓
	Director/Senior manager (coded 2)	0.09	0.04	[0.03, 0.16]	Yes ✓
Index of moderated mediation (IMM)		−0.05	0.04	[−0.09, −0.02]	Yes ✓

BC CI = Bias-Corrected 95% Confidence Interval. No CI includes zero, confirming significance of all moderated mediation effects. b = unstandardised regression coefficient. SE values report the standard deviation of the bootstrap sampling distribution; inference is based on the bias-corrected CI, which accounts for asymmetry and bias in the bootstrap distribution and should not be used to construct normal-approximation confidence intervals for indirect effects (Hayes, 2018, p. 97). Job Level coding: 0 = Staff/Specialist, 1 = Supervisor/Manager, 2 = Director/Senior Manager (consistent with Table 2 coding scheme throughout).