Table 21.
Ablation study results for DQN showing the impact of removing individual simulation components.
| Ablation setting | Mean reward | Relative change | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full model | Best | — | Rich dynamics allow DQN to exploit contextual, stochastic, and long-horizon structure |
| No rich state-action effects | ↓↓ | Large decrease | Removes context-dependent leverage, collapsing advantage of deep function approximation |
| No adherence stochasticity | ↓ | Moderate decrease | Eliminates uncertainty signals critical for robust policy learning |
| No behavioral drift | ↑ (artificial) | Inflated | Unrealistically optimistic rewards due to stationary behavior |
| No dropout/re-engagement | ↑ (artificial) | Inflated | Removes long-term engagement penalties and overestimates policy quality |
| No environmental modulation | ↓ | Moderate decrease | Reduces contextual diversity, limiting state generalization |
| No misreporting noise | ↓ | Small decrease | Simplifies perception, reducing robustness but less critical than dynamics |
Performance degradation is reported relative to the full model.