Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 28;16(1):151–160. doi: 10.1159/000552048

Table 2.

AUC comparison of XGBoost vs. clinical scores and ML models for sICH prediction

Tools AUC Diff (XGBoost – Target) p value
SEDAN 0.344 0
MSS 0.259 <0.001
HAT 0.142 0.014
GRASPS 0.180 0.006
SITS 0.199 0.002
SPAN-100 0.379 0
Logistic 0.024 0.579
RandomForest 0.024 0.403