Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 8;14:e21504. doi: 10.7717/peerj.21504

Table 2. Discrimination and calibration performance of machine learning models in differentiating lung cancer from controls.

Model AUC (95% CI) Accuracy F1 score NPV PPV Sensitivity Specificity Brier score Threshold
LASSO 0.926 (0.834–1.000) 0.957 0.963 0.966 0.951 0.975 0.933 0.069 0.646
LightGBM 0.956 (0.882–1.000) 0.914 0.923 0.875 0.947 0.900 0.933 0.074 0.577
SVM 0.947 (0.878–1.000) 0.943 0.950 0.933 0.950 0.950 0.933 0.075 0.582
XGBoost 0.951 (0.895–1.000) 0.929 0.937 0.903 0.949 0.975 0.933 0.074 0.493

Notes.

AUC
area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
Accuracy
proportion of correctly classified cases
Sensitivity
true positive rate
Specificity
true negative rate
PPV
positive predictive value
NPV
negative predictive value
F1 score
harmonic mean of sensitivity and PPV
Brier score
mean squared error between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes (range: 0–1, with lower values indicating better calibration)