Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 11;16:21643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-61930-8

Table 3.

Results for varying wood species and processing parameters.

Sample Yield (%) Shives (%) Kappa Brightness (%) Viscosity (mL/g)
SWS 48.7 ± 1.1 0.17 ± 0.11 14.2 ± 2.2 32.9 ± 0.6 1057
SWM 49.3 ± 1.5 1.24 ± 0.19 17.7 ± 0.1 33.5 ± 0.1 1122
SWL 48.6 ± 1.3 3.48 ± 0.87 19.9 ± 1.7 34.5 ± 0.2 1158
HWS 50.4 ± 0.9 0.38 ± 0.29 8.8 ± 0.1 34.2 ± 0.7 1252
HWM 50.0 ± 0.7 2.45 ± 0.46 10.5 ± 0.1 32.7 ± 0.9 1281
HWL 49.1 ± 0.8 6.37 ± 0.10 11.7 ± 0.1 33.2 ± 1.2 1278
HWA 44.1 ± 0.1 11.61 ± 0.94 13.7 ± 0.25 34.0 ± 0.5 -
HWAV 46.7 6.94 11.8 33.8 ± 0.3 -
HWAL 32.9 29.12 22.1 29.2 ± 0.1 -
HWAH 49.9 2.16 9.3 31.5 ± 0.1 -
HWA0.75 40.1 20.38 19.9 29.0 ± 0.2 -
HWA0.5 28.9 41.78 - 24.4 ± 0.1 -
SWR 43.5 0.97 23.9 33 1111
HWR 50.7 1.01 14.7 37.5 1269

The average value with standard deviation is shown for duplicate samples. Unsorted chips “A” is the average of all measured chips for each species. “S” refers to the smallest fraction of chips, “M” medium fraction, and “L” large fraction. High and low processing temperature is denoted by “H” and “L” respectively. The introduction of a vacuum impregnation is denoted by “V”. Chemical charge is denoted as the percentage of standard, “0.75” and “0.5” respectively. See Table 2 for a full breakdown of parameters.