Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1992 Sep 15;147(6):859–864.

Studying patients' preferences in health care decision making. Health Services Research Group.

PMCID: PMC1336332  PMID: 1525729

Full text

PDF
864

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blanchard C. G., Labrecque M. S., Ruckdeschel J. C., Blanchard E. B. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(11):1139–1145. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90343-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyd N. F., Sutherland H. J., Heasman K. Z., Tritchler D. L., Cummings B. J. Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):58–67. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassileth B. R., Zupkis R. V., Sutton-Smith K., March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jun;92(6):832–836. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ciampi A., Silberfeld M., Till J. E. Measurement of individual preferences. The importance of "situation-specific" variables. Med Decis Making. 1982 Winter;2(4):483–495. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8200200411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colcher I. S., Bass J. W. Penicillin treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. A comparison of schedules and the role of specific counseling. JAMA. 1972 Nov 6;222(6):657–659. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Degner L. F., Russell C. A. Preferences for treatment control among adults with cancer. Res Nurs Health. 1988 Dec;11(6):367–374. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Froberg D. G., Kane R. L. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--I: Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(4):345–354. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goel V. Decision analysis: applications and limitations. The Health Services Research Group. CMAJ. 1992 Aug 15;147(4):413–417. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaplan R. M., Ernst J. A. Do category rating scales produce biased preference weights for a health index? Med Care. 1983 Feb;21(2):193–207. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198302000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Llewellyn-Thomas H. A., McGreal M. J., Thiel E. C., Fine S., Erlichman C. Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90124-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Llewellyn-Thomas H. A., Sutherland H. J., Tritchler D. L., Lockwood G. A., Till J. E., Ciampi A., Scott J. F., Lickley L. A., Fish E. B. Benign and malignant breast disease: the relationship between women's health status and health values. Med Decis Making. 1991 Jul-Sep;11(3):180–188. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9101100307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Llewellyn-Thomas H. A., Thiel E. C., Clark R. M. Patients versus surrogates: whose opinion counts on ethics review panels? Clin Res. 1989 Sep;37(3):501–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Llewellyn-Thomas H. A., Thiel E. C., McGreal M. J. Cancer patients' evaluations of their current health states: the influences of expectations, comparisons, actual health status, and mood. Med Decis Making. 1992 Apr-Jun;12(2):115–122. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9201200204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Llewellyn-Thomas H., Sutherland H. J., Tibshirani R., Ciampi A., Till J. E., Boyd N. F. The measurement of patients' values in medicine. Med Decis Making. 1982 Winter;2(4):449–462. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8200200407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mapes R. E. Verbal and numerical estimates of probability in therapeutic contexts. Soc Sci Med. 1979 May;13A(3):277–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mazur D. J., Hickam D. H. Treatment preferences of patients and physicians: influences of summary data when framing effects are controlled. Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):2–5. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McNeil B. J., Pauker S. G., Sox H. C., Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259–1262. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McNeil B. J., Weichselbaum R., Pauker S. G. Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1978 Dec 21;299(25):1397–1401. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197812212992506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mehrez A., Gafni A. Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents. Med Decis Making. 1989 Apr-Jun;9(2):142–149. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8900900209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller G., Shank J. C. Patient education: comparative effectiveness by means of presentation. J Fam Pract. 1986 Feb;22(2):178–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Connor A. M., Boyd N. F., Tritchler D. L., Kriukov Y., Sutherland H., Till J. E. Eliciting preferences for alternative cancer drug treatments. The influence of framing, medium, and rater variables. Med Decis Making. 1985 Winter;5(4):453–463. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8500500408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. O'Connor A. M., Boyd N. F., Warde P., Stolbach L., Till J. E. Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(8):811–818. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90133-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. O'Connor A. M. Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(2):119–126. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90085-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Read J. L., Quinn R. J., Berwick D. M., Fineberg H. V., Weinstein M. C. Preferences for health outcomes. Comparison of assessment methods. Med Decis Making. 1984;4(3):315–329. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8400400307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shank J. C., Murphy M., Schulte-Mowry L. Patient preferences regarding educational pamphlets in the family practice center. Fam Med. 1991 Aug;23(6):429–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Siminoff L. A., Fetting J. H. Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions. Med Decis Making. 1989 Oct-Dec;9(4):262–271. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8900900406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Strull W. M., Lo B., Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA. 1984 Dec 7;252(21):2990–2994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sutherland H. J., Dunn V., Boyd N. F. Measurement of values for states of health with linear analog scales. Med Decis Making. 1983;3(4):477–487. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8300300406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sutherland H. J., Llewellyn-Thomas H. A., Lockwood G. A., Tritchler D. L., Till J. E. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989 May;82(5):260–263. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sutherland H. J., Llewellyn-Thomas H., Boyd N. F., Till J. E. Attitudes toward quality of survival. The concept of "maximal endurable time". Med Decis Making. 1982;2(3):299–309. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8200200306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sutherland H. J., Lockwood G. A., Till J. E. Are we getting informed consent from patients with cancer? J R Soc Med. 1990 Jul;83(7):439–443. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sutherland H. J., Lockwood G. A., Tritchler D. L., Sem F., Brooks L., Till J. E. Communicating probabilistic information to cancer patients: is there 'noise' on the line? Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):725–731. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Torrance G. W., Boyle M. H., Horwood S. P. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res. 1982 Nov-Dec;30(6):1043–1069. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.6.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Torrance G. W. Health index and utility models: some thorny issues. Health Serv Res. 1973;8(1):12–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Torrance G. W. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1–30. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Torrance G. W., Thomas W. H., Sackett D. L. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972 Summer;7(2):118–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453–458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES