Table 6.
The reasoning behind the cluster descriptions
| Age | Clusters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Young | Mean age of the cluster under 35 | 1, 2, 3 | |
| Middle-aged | Mean age of the cluster 35–50 | 4, 5, 6, 7 | |
| Over middle-aged | Mean age of the cluster over 50 | 8, 9, 10, 11 | |
| Level of education | |||
| Low or intermediate | Under 15% of the individuals in the cluster have a higher degree and more individuals have a primary or unknown degree than a higher degree | 2, 3, 4, 10 | |
| Intermediate to high | Over 15% of the individuals in the cluster have a higher degree and more individuals have a secondary degree than primary or unknown degree | 1, 7, 9, 11 | |
| High | Over 80% of the individuals in the cluster have a higher degree | 5, 6, 8 | |
| Family type | |||
| Living alone | Over 80% of the individuals in the cluster live alone | 1, 9 | |
| Living in a relationship | Over 60% of the individuals in the cluster live with another adult | 2, 3, 5, 10, 11 | |
| Living with a family | Over 80% of the individuals in the cluster live in with another adult and at least one child | 4, 6, 7 | |
| Single parent | Over 30% of the individuals in the cluster live with at least one child | 8 | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 100% of the people in the cluster are men | 3, 7 | |
| Female | 100% of the people in the cluster are women | 2, 6 | |
| Health | |||
| Good | Over 50% of the people in the cluster have no health challenges | 1, 3, 5, 6 | |
| Intermediate | Over 40% of the individuals in the cluster have one health challenge | 2, 4, 7 | |
| Poor | Over 10% of the individuals in the cluster have two health challenges and less than 50% of them have no health challenges | 8, 9, 10, 11 | |
| Type of municipality of residence | |||
| City | Over 80% of the individuals in the cluster live in a city | 1, 2, 3, 5 | |
| Urban or rural | Over 60% of the individuals in the cluster live either in an urban or rural area | 10 | |