Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 1;17:1881194. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1881194

Table 4.

Performance of clinical, radiomics, deep learning radiomics, and combined models.

Model Cohort ACC AUC (95% CI) SEN SPE PPV NPV F1-score Threshold
Clinical Training 0.852 0.804 (0.750–0.857) 0.943 0.591 0.868 0.783 0.904 0.656
Radiomics Training 0.882 0.943 (0.917–0.970) 0.886 0.873 0.952 0.727 0.918 0.787
DLR Training 0.915 0.970 (0.955–0.986) 0.911 0.927 0.973 0.785 0.941 0.842
Combined Training 0.918 0.972 (0.958–0.987) 0.917 0.918 0.970 0.795 0.943 0.877
Clinical Validation 0.856 0.820 (0.737–0.902) 0.927 0.628 0.888 0.730 0.907 0.738
Radiomics Validation 0.917 0.912 (0.852–0.973) 0.964 0.767 0.930 0.868 0.946 0.431
DLR Validation 0.894 0.940 (0.896–0.984) 0.912 0.837 0.947 0.750 0.929 0.566
Combined Validation 0.889 0.942 (0.902–0.982) 0.905 0.837 0.947 0.735 0.925 0.537

DLR, Deep learning radiomics; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value;ACC, Accuracy;SEN, Sensitivity; SPE,Specificity.