Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 1;14:1873901. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2026.1873901

TABLE 3.

Comparison of fundus parameters among the healthy control group, gestational hypertension group, and preeclampsia group.

Ocular fundus parameters GH vs. Normotensive pregnant control PE vs. Normotensive pregnant control PE vs. GH
FD 0.024* 0.036* >0.99
AT0.5–1.0PD 0.024* 0.036* >0.99
VT 0.042* 0.940 0.573
VCDR 0.010* 0.172 >0.99
ABA >0.99 0.282 0.034*
VD1.0–1.5PD 0.036* 0.346 >0.99
VD_fovea 0.011* 0.401 0.667
AD (μm) <0.001* 0.004* >0.99
AD0.5–1.0PD (μm) <0.001* 0.016* 0.148
MVD (μm) <0.001* <0.001* >0.99
AVR 0.001* 0.113 0.708
FTD 0.055 0.009* >0.99

FD, vascular fractal dimension in the inferior optic disc region; AT0.5–1.0PD, mean arterial tortuosity at 0.5–1.0 papillary diameter (PD) from the optic disc margin; VT, venous tortuosity; VCDR, vertical cup-to-disc ratio; ABA, mean arterial branching angle; VD1.0–1.5PD, vascular density at 1.0–1.5 PD from the optic disc margin; VD_fovea, vascular density within 5 mm of the fovea centralis; AD, arterial diameter; AD0.5–1.0PD, mean arterial diameter at 0.5–1.0 PD from the optic disc margin; MVD, mean venous diameter within 3 mm of the fovea centralis; AVR, arteriovenous diameter ratio; FTD, density of fundus tessellation. Data are presented as adjusted P-values. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Bonferroni-corrected multiple pairwise comparisons.

*

indicates statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).