Table 7.
Comparison ML models with design codes and literatures.
| No. | Authors | Shape of CFST | Type of comparison | FEM description | R 2 | RMSE (kN) | MAE (kN) | MAPE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Present study | All shapes of polygon CFST | SVR | – | 0.7367 | 4102.71 | 2111.74 | 30.51 |
| RF | 0.9839 | 1015.16 | 538.15 | 8.95 | ||||
| GB | 0.9619 | 1560.01 | 899.61 | 24.03 | ||||
| DNN | 0.9979 | 362.83 | 253.07 | 6.61 | ||||
| 2 | Ren et al.34 | Triangular CFST | DBJ13-51-2010 – EXP | – | 0.8498 | 98.40 | 76.50 | 5.83 |
| Eurocode 4 – EXP | 0.7543 | 79.08 | 71.17 | 5.21 | ||||
| 3 | Zhu and Chan49 | Triangular CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 1 | 60.12 | 43.50 | 3.60 |
| 4 | Liu and Williamns36 | Square CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by Ayough9 | 0.9999 | 155.49 | 144.60 | 6.69 |
| AISC 360 – EXP | - | 0.9314 | 1270.23 | 863.33 | 29.26 | |||
| Eurocode 4 – EXP | 1 | 119.39 | 119.33 | 6.33 | ||||
| ACI – EXP | 1 | 278.88 | 262 | 12.25746 | ||||
| 5 | Huang et al.37 | Square CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by Ayough9 | The sample is only one available and not possible to count R2. | |||
| 6 | Schneider35 | Square CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by Ayough9 | 0.9880 | 109.04 | 83.76 | 5.99 |
| 7 | Zhu and Chan39 | Square CFST | Eurocode 4 – EXP | – | 0.9963 | 308.74 | 260.14 | 4.73 |
| ACI – EXP | 0.9964 | 701.97 | 601.14 | 10.72 | ||||
| 8 | Zhong55 | Square CFST | Eq. M. Yu et al.59 – EXP | – | 0.5362 | 313.37 | 245.89 | 10.83 |
| 9 | Liu57 | Square CFST | Eq. M. Yu et al.59 – EXP | – | 0.8787 | 194.24 | 164.50 | 7.42 |
| 10 | Liu et al.56 | Square CFST | Eq. M. Yu et al.59 – EXP | – | 0.9949 | 98.04 | 81.13 | 3.87 |
| 11 | Zhang et al.56 | Square CFST | Eq. M. Yu et al.59 – EXP | – | 0.9436 | 248.62 | 218.59 | 11.79 |
| 12 | Yu et al.59 | Square CFST | Eq. M. Yu et al.59 – EXP | – | 0.7174 | 90.82 | 76.33 | 4.84 |
| 13 | Zhu et al.60 | Square CFST | AISC 360 – EXP | – | 0.9974 | 1225.85 | 1201.75 | 38.60 |
| Eurocode 4 – EXP | 0.9974 | 1581.80 | 1529.25 | 48.38 | ||||
| 14 | Hilo et al.62 | Square CFST | Eurocode 4 – FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.8206 | 134.02 | 105.03 | 7.80 |
| 15 | Ayough et al.9 | Square, Hexagon, & Octagon CFST | AISC 360 – EXP | – | Comparison with literatures is only show the mean of Nu formula/Nu EXP. | |||
| Eurocode 4 – EXP | ||||||||
| 16 | Li et al.30 | Rectangular CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by Ami and Patel31 | 0.9735 | 78.43 | 64.75 | 3.96 |
| AISC 360 – EXP | – | 0.9615 | 571.62 | 568.50 | 34.17 | |||
| GB50936 – EXP | 0.9598 | 240.69 | 234.05 | 13.94 | ||||
| CECS 28:90 - EXP | 0.9682 | 205.93 | 200.13 | 12.01 | ||||
| Eq. Li et al.30 – EXP | 0.9506 | 61.44 | 55.83 | 3.48 | ||||
| 17 | Hilo et al.62 | Rectangular CFST | Eurocode 4 – FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.8080 | 247.48 | 232.44 | 17.40 |
| 18 | Hilo et al.62 | Pentagon CFST | Eurocode 4 – FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.8047 | 205.81 | 186.08 | 13 |
| 19 | Ding et al.29 | Hexagon CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 0.9320 | 289.22 | 278.13 | 4.54 |
| Eq. M. Yu et al.59 – EXP | – | 0.9261 | 491.50 | 419.88 | 7.08 | |||
| Eq. Ding et al.29 – EXP | 0.9263 | 513.81 | 445.75 | 7.49 | ||||
| 20 | Ding et al.29 | Hexagon CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by Ami and Patel31 | 0.9805 | 195.20 | 155.75 | 2.57 |
| 21 | Ding et al.29 | Hexagon CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by Ayough9 | 0.9112 | 444.75 | 382.16 | 6.07 |
| 22 | Xu et al.47 | Hexagon CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 0.9122 | 99.71 | 73.50 | 4.25 |
| DBJ13-51-2010 – EXP | – | 0.9008 | 108.58 | 83.83 | 4.54 | |||
| Eurocode 4 - EXP | 0.8957 | 86.25 | 74.83 | 4.33 | ||||
| AIJ 2008 – EXP | 0.8969 | 162.58 | 141.83 | 7.51 | ||||
| 23 | Liu et al.48 | Hexagon CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by Ahmed and Liang50 | Not possible to count R2. | |||
| 24 | Zhu and Chan49 | Hexagon CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work | 1 | 26 | 26 | 1.38 |
| FE – EXP | Observed by Ahmed and Liang50 | 1 | 31.02 | 29 | 1.54 | |||
| AISC 360 – EXP | – | Not possible to count R2. | ||||||
| GB50936 – EXP | Not possible to count R2. | |||||||
| Eurocode 4 - EXP | Not possible to count R2. | |||||||
| 25 | Shen et al.52 | Hexagon CFST with/without inner steel tube | FE – EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 0.9851 | 582.02 | 393.46 | 4.83 |
| 26 | Ramadan et al.28 | Hexagon CFST with/without inner steel tube | FE – EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 0.9887 | 271.75 | 235.20 | 5.15 |
| 27 | Ramadan et al.28 | Hexagon CFST | Nu with fscy modified MOHURD76 – FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.9659 | 244.53 | 170.71 | 8.03 |
| Nu with fscy modified Han et al.77 – FE | 0.9919 | 268.35 | 212.58 | 9.90 | ||||
| Nu with fscy modified Shen et al.33 – FE | 0.9961 | 61.76 | 48.54 | 2.63 | ||||
| Ramadan et al.28 – FE | 0.9946 | 172.00 | 149.25 | 7.84 | ||||
| 28 | Hilo et al.62 | Hexagon CFST | Eurocode 4 – FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.7868 | 240.55 | 222.28 | 15.20 |
| 29 | Hilo et al.62 | Heptagon CFST | Eurocode 4 – FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.7832 | 256.58 | 239.40 | 16.20 |
| 30 | Ding et al.26 | Octagon CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 0.9868 | 501.08 | 469.25 | 4.22 |
| FE – EXP | Observed by Hassanein et al. (2018) | 0.9764 | 490.71 | 427.88 | 3.87 | |||
| FE – EXP | Observed by Ayough9 | 1 | 691.77 | 591.20 | 5.68 | |||
| Eq. Ding et al.26 – EXP | – | 0.9881 | 1234.93 | 1197.25 | 10.46 | |||
| Eq. M. Yu et al.59 – EXP | 0.9883 | 1238.86 | 1225.75 | 11.06 | ||||
| 31 | Tomii et al.24 | Octagon CFST | FE – EXP | Observed by Ding et al.26 | 0.9231 | 33.36 | 33.33 | 3.00 |
| FE – EXP | Observed by Ayough9 | 0.9440 | 48.34 | 47.48 | 4.59 | |||
| FE – EXP | Observed by Hassanein et al.25 | 0.9714 | 43.10 | 39.75 | 3.92 | |||
| Eq. Ding et al.26 – EXP | – | 0.9478 | 214.52 | 212.00 | 18.88 | |||
| Eq. M. Yu et al.59 - EXP | 0.9490 | 58.62 | 52.33 | 4.73 | ||||
| 32 | Fang et al.38 | Octagon CFST | FE - EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 0.9978 | 51.34 | 43.45 | 2.25 |
| 33 | Zhu and Chan39 | Octagon CFST | Eurocode 4 - EXP | – | 0.9984 | 605.10 | 604.57 | 17.41 |
| ACI - EXP | 0.9984 | 868.31 | 862.71 | 24.37 | ||||
| 34 | Ahmed and Liang40 | Octagon CFST | Ahmed and Liang50 - FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.9908 | 1497.27 | 1161.33 | 4.77 |
| 35 | Chen and Chan8 | Octagon CFST | Eurocode 4 - EXP | – | 0.9948 | 243.10 | 215.60 | 6.14 |
| Nu ic - EXP | 0.9937 | 110.60 | 83.20 | 2.27 | ||||
| Nu cc - EXP | 0.9928 | 111.93 | 87.45 | 2.38 | ||||
| 36 | Hassanein et al.25 | Octagon CFST | Eq. Ding et al.26 - FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.9910 | 720.02 | 559.60 | 3.44 |
| Eq. M. Yu et al.59 - FE | 0.9754 | 3453.61 | 2986.69 | 16.97 | ||||
| Eq. Patel et al., 2016 - FE | 0.9905 | 2344.07 | 2093.38 | 12.31 | ||||
| 37 | Fang et al.42 | Octagon CFST | FE - EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 0.9937 | 133.69 | 118.50 | 3.24 |
| 38 | Manigandan et al.43 | Octagon CFST with/without inner steel tube | FE - EXP | Observed by themselves or the authors of the work. | 0.9938 | 37.97 | 36.75 | 4.51 |
| 39 | Alqawzai et al.41 | Octagon CFST with/without inner steel tube | Parametric study of FEM and not compared to design codes/proposed equations of literatures | |||||
| 40 | Ami and Zahrai51 | Octagon CFST with/without inner steel tube | Parametric study of FEM and not compared to design codes/proposed equations of literatures | |||||
| 41 | Zha53 | Octagon CFST | Eq. M. Yu et al.59 - EXP | Not possible to count R2. | ||||
| 42 | Zhang et al.54 | Octagon CFST | Eq. M. Yu et al.59 - EXP | – | 0.9958 | 376.72 | 346.82 | 13.63 |
| 43 | Zhu et al.60 | Octagon CFST | AISC 360 - EXP | 0.9830 | 888.67 | 865.57 | 22.96 | |
| Zhu and Chan39 - EXP | 0.9832 | 381.03 | 341.57 | 8.65 | ||||
| Liu et al.75 – EXP | 0.9829 | 255.21 | 222.86 | 6.76 | ||||
| 44 | Hilo et al.62 | Octagon CFST | Eurocode 4 - FE | Parametric study of FEM | 0.7699 | 327.96 | 313.27 | 20.40 |
| 45 | Almamoori et al.27 | Triangular, Square, Rectangular, Rhombic, Pentagon, Hexagon, and Octagon CFST | Not compared to design codes/proposed equations of literatures | |||||
| 46 | Bai et al.32 | Square CFST | Not compared to design codes/proposed equations of literatures | |||||
| 47 | Samir et al.61 | Hexagon, Square, & Triangle CFST | Not compared to design codes/proposed equations of literatures | |||||
| 48 | Hassanein et al.45 | Hexagon | Not compared to design codes/proposed equations of literatures | |||||
| 49 | Evirgen et al.46 | Hexagon CFST | Not compared to design codes/proposed equations of literatures | |||||