Skip to main content
. 2002 Apr;22(8):2799–2809. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.8.2799-2809.2002

TABLE 1.

BWs and HWs of Akt transgenic and NTg micea

Age (wks) and mice No. of mice BW (g) HW (mg) Lung wt (mg) Liver wt (mg) HW/BW ratio Lung wt/BW ratio Liver wt/BW ratio
2
    NTg 7 9.0 ± 0.3 53.7 ± 2.3 100.5 ± 5.2 371 ± 25 5.98 ± 0.11 11.19 ± 0.46 41.1 ± 2.1
    caAkt 6 7.7 ± 0.2 100.3 ± 4.1b 132.2 ± 3.5b 353 ± 11 13.02 ± 0.42b 17.23 ± 0.73b 45.6 ± 2.1
    kdAkt 6 8.5 ± 0.4 8.5 ± 3.3 97.9 ± 7.0 366 ± 2.0 6.05 ± 0.22 10.99 ± 0.26 41.3 ± 0.9
14
    NTg 15 22.9 ± 0.5 104.3 ± 2.1 134.3 ± 5.2 1,075 ± 33 4.57 ± 0.08 5.88 ± 0.16 47.0 ± 1.2
    caAkt 13 21.6 ± 0.4 213.1 ± 4.6b 185.8 ± 5.0b 1,050 ± 29 9.88 ± 0.22b 8.62 ± 0.25b 48.6 ± 0.9
    kdAkt 4 23.1 ± 0.9 107.9 ± 5.6 125.3 ± 3.1 1,049 ± 67 4.67 ± 0.09 5.46 ± 0.27 46.0 ± 4.7
a

The values shown are means ± SE. In the 2-week-old groups, both male and female mice were used for analysis. In the 14-week-old groups, only female mice were used.

b

P < 0.05 versus NTg mice.