Skip to main content
Frontiers in Nutrition logoLink to Frontiers in Nutrition
. 2026 Jul 2;13:1873386. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1873386

Targeting the cardio–neuro axis through nutrition: inflammatory mechanisms linking cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases

Darragh Curran 1,2, Neluwa-Liyanage Indika 3, Raymond Thomas 4,5, Niloofar Shekoohi 2,6, Andreas M Grabrucker 2,6,7, Ioannis Zabetakis 1,2,7, Ramak Esfandi 4,*, Ronan Lordan 8,9,10,*
PMCID: PMC13372588  PMID: 42466150

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCD), particularly cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and neurodegenerative diseases (ND), remain leading causes of global morbidity and mortality. Although traditionally studied in isolation, accumulating evidence indicates that these conditions are mechanistically interconnected through shared pathways, including chronic systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and dysregulated lipid metabolism. Here, we propose a cardio–neuro axis in which vascular and neurodegenerative processes are linked along a continuum that is modifiable through diet. In this perspective, we synthesise evidence linking inflammatory and neurovascular dysfunction across CVD and ND and argue that nutrition represents a primary, yet under-integrated, lever for targeting these shared mechanisms. We focus on dietary patterns and bioactive components that influence inflammation resolution, endothelial function, and metabolic homeostasis. However, despite strong mechanistic rationale, nutritional strategies for ND remain fragmented, with an overreliance on single-nutrient interventions and limited incorporation of vascular endpoints or mechanistic biomarkers. We contend that progress in this field requires a shift from reductionist approaches toward whole-diet interventions evaluated using integrated cardio-neuro outcomes, alongside stratified and personalised designs. Embedding nutrition within a unified cardio-neuro framework earlier in life may offer a scalable and mechanistically grounded strategy to reduce the burden of NCD across the life course.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease, functional foods, neurodegeneration, nootropic foods, nutraceuticals, supplements, systemic inflammation

Introduction

Non-communicable diseases (NCD) are responsible for the majority of global mortality, accounting for 43 million deaths and 75% of non-pandemic-related deaths globally in 2021 (1). Among the most devastating are neurodegenerative diseases (ND) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). While CVD remains the leading cause of death, ND, particularly Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and vascular dementia are characterised by prolonged disease trajectories and increasing prevalence driven by population ageing. Despite their clinical distinction, these conditions frequently co-occur and share key risk factors, including ageing, metabolic dysfunction, and lifestyle exposures (2–4). We define the cardio-neuro axis as the bidirectional biological continuum linking cardiovascular and neurodegenerative health through shared inflammatory, vascular, metabolic, and lipid-mediated pathways. This framework provides a mechanistic basis for understanding how cardiovascular dysfunction may contribute to neurodegeneration and vice versa. While previous heart-brain axis frameworks have largely focused on physiological, haemodynamic, and neurohumoral interactions (3), the cardio-neuro axis proposed here emphasizes chronic inflammatory and metabolic disease processes and positions nutrition as a unifying and modifiable intervention strategy across both cardiovascular and ND trajectories. Currently, 55 million people worldwide live with dementia; this number is expected to reach 139 million by 2050 (5). The latest data show that dementia prevalence doubles every 5 years after the age of 60. Alzheimer’s disease accounts for approximately 70% of all dementia cases, making it an urgent and growing global challenge (6). Furthermore, more than 10 million people worldwide are estimated to live with Parkinson’s disease (7).

Despite substantial advances in cardiovascular therapeutics, including widespread statin use (8), CVD remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide and a major contributor to morbidity, placing a significant burden on global healthcare systems (8–10). Approximately 19.8 million people died from CVD in 2022, accounting for 32% of all global deaths. Of these deaths, 85% were due to myocardial infarction and stroke (9).

While primordial prevention through dietary and lifestyle modification is an effective strategy to reduce CVD risk (11, 12), emerging evidence suggests nutrition also plays a critical role in the onset and prevention of other NCD, including ND (13–15). Several inflammation-related mechanisms are shared across NCD, including ND and CVD, and may be targeted by similar therapeutic approaches (16–18).

Within this strategy, functional foods, dietary supplements, nutraceuticals, and nootropic ingredients are also under consideration for preventing and/or treating CVD and ND. Although often discussed interchangeably, these products vary in their regulatory classifications with distinct definitions (19). Functional foods are generally defined as foods that provide health benefits beyond their fundamental nutritive value. However, they do not independently treat or prevent disease, nor are they essential components of a balanced diet (19). Dietary supplements consist of nutrients or compounds designed to augment nutrient intake, avert deficiencies, and potentially offer therapeutic effects despite not being their primary purpose (20). Nutraceuticals consist of nutrients or bioactive extracts derived from food or natural sources for prophylactic or therapeutic purposes (20, 21). Nootropic foods or ingredients are biochemical compounds in foods and beverages that may improve cognition, learning, memory, and brain cellular function across the lifespan (22). Importantly, regulation and health claims related to functional foods and nutraceuticals are different around the world. In Europe, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) requires scientific substantiation for nutrition and health claims before they can be authorized, reflecting a generally more precautionary, pre-market approach (19, 21, 23). By contrast, in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates these products under a different framework, with more emphasis on product category, labelling, and post-market oversight rather than the same pre-market claim authorization model used in the European Union. As a result, a claim that is permitted in one market may need to be reformulated, softened, or removed in the other (19, 21, 23–25). Owing to differences in global regulatory oversight, these health claims, often closer to marketing claims, may vary considerably in scientific substantiation (26, 27).

In this article, we discuss the common aetiologies underlying CVD and ND along the cardio-neuro axis, such as shared inflammatory pathways, oxidative stress, and endothelial or neurovascular dysfunction, and provide our perspectives on how dietary and nutrient-based approaches, including functional foods, supplements, and nutraceuticals, are being explored to target these overlapping mechanisms for prevention and adjunctive therapy.

Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress as a common underlying mechanism in cardiovascular disease and neurodegeneration

Chronic low-grade systemic inflammation is increasingly recognised as a central, shared mechanism underpinning both CVD and ND. Unlike acute inflammation, which is protective and self-limiting, persistent activation of the innate immune system contributes to a sustained inflammatory state and progressive tissue dysfunction across multiple organ systems (28). This state is characterised by sustained elevations of pro-inflammatory mediators, including cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), along with acute-phase proteins including C-reactive protein (CRP). Elevated levels of these mediators are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and cognitive decline (17, 29, 30).

In the context of CVD, it is now understood that inflammation plays a causal role in all stages of atherosclerosis, from endothelial dysfunction and lipid deposition to plaque progression and rupture (31, 32). Endothelial activation promotes the expression of adhesion molecules, facilitating monocyte recruitment to lesion-prone intimal sites, where they differentiate into macrophages. Theses cells internalise oxidized lipoproteins to form foam cells and sustain a pro-inflammatory vascular milieu (33). Clinical trials targeting inflammatory pathways, such as IL-1β inhibition, have demonstrated reductions in recurrent cardiovascular events independent of lipid lowering, reinforcing the causal contribution of inflammation to atherothrombosis (34–36).

In many ND such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, similar inflammatory processes occur, collectively referred to as neuroinflammation, which is a defining pathological feature. Peripheral inflammatory signals can access the central nervous system (CNS) via humoral and neural pathways or through disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), leading to activation of microglia and astrocytes (37). While acute glial activation may be protective, chronic activation promotes the release of neurotoxic cytokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and complement factors, contributing to synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal loss (38–40). In Alzheimer’s disease, chronic neuroinflammation contributes to amyloid-β accumulation and tau pathology (41, 42), whereas in Parkinson’s disease inflammatory processes interact with α-synuclein aggregation and dopaminergic neuronal degeneration (43, 44). In vascular dementia, endothelial dysfunction, cerebral small vessel disease, and chronic cerebral hypoperfusion represent particularly important mechanisms linking cardiovascular and neurodegenerative pathology.

Systemic inflammation is closely linked to vascular dysfunction in both peripheral and cerebral circulation. Chronic endothelial activation reduces nitric oxide bioavailability, increases oxidative stress, and contributes to chronic cerebral hypoperfusion and impaired neurovascular coupling, while also disrupting BBB integrity and enabling circulating cytokines and immune cells to enter the central nervous system to amplify neuroinflammatory cascades (45). This interplay between vascular dysfunction, impaired neurovascular coupling, cerebral hypoperfusion, BBB disruption, impaired neurovascular coupling, and inflammation represents a key mechanistic bridge linking cardiovascular and ND processes (46, 47).

Lipid biology further integrates these processes across the cardio-neuro axis. Dysregulated lipoproteins and altered membrane lipid composition influence membrane fluidity, lipid raft organisation, and inflammatory signalling (48). Diets high in saturated fats promote pro-inflammatory pathways, including NF-κB activation, while impairing resolution. In the CNS, disrupted lipid homeostasis compromises synaptic integrity and myelination, contributing to impaired neuronal function and pathological protein aggregation (49).

These processes are interconnected within a neuro-cardiac continuum, where vascular inflammation impairs cerebral perfusion and BBB function, and neuroinflammation further exacerbates systemic metabolic and vascular dysfunction (50). Shared factors such as obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, poor diet, and gut microbiota dysbiosis reinforce this overlap between cardiovascular and ND (51, 52). Collectively, systemic inflammation is a unifying, targetable driver of both CVD and ND, linking vascular dysfunction, BBB disruption, and lipid-mediated inflammatory signalling (Figure 1), providing a strong rationale for dietary and nutrient-based interventions.

Figure 1.

Infographic showing the relationship between cardiovascular disease and neurodegenerative disease. Cardiovascular disease includes atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction, thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Neurodegenerative disease includes neuroinflammation, synaptic dysfunction, neuronal loss, and cognitive decline. Shared mechanisms listed are chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, blood-brain barrier disruption, and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Arrows connect each disease to the shared mechanisms in the center circle.

Conceptual overview showing the shared mechanisms linking cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and neurodegenerative diseases (ND).

Oxidative stress is a key contributor to both CVD and ND, linking vascular dysfunction with neuronal damage through shared pathological mechanisms (53, 54). Reduced activity of paraoxonase 1 (PON1), an HDL-associated antioxidant enzyme that prevents lipid peroxide accumulation in LDL, has been reported in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and coronary heart disease (55–57). Similarly, lipid peroxidation markers such as malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) are implicated in coronary heart disease and ND (58–61). Mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress are closely linked to chronic inflammation and oxidative stress in both CVD and ND. Impaired mitochondrial bioenergetics promotes ROS production and inflammatory signalling, whereas unresolved ER stress activates pathways such as the unfolded protein response that contribute to vascular dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and cell death (62–64).

In coronary heart disease, excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) promote oxidation of LDL to oxLDL, driving foam cell formation, endothelial activation, inflammation, and plaque instability (65, 66). Comparable oxidative mechanisms occur in ND, where mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, neuroinflammation, and impaired antioxidant defences contribute to neuronal injury (67). In vascular cognitive impairment and dementia, oxLDL disrupts endothelial function and sustains neuroinflammation, while in Alzheimer’s disease oxidative stress interacts with amyloid-β and tau pathology (68, 69). In Parkinson’s disease, dopaminergic neurons are particularly susceptible due to dopamine oxidation, iron accumulation, glutathione depletion, and mitochondrial dysfunction, all of which increase ROS production and neuronal death (70). Collectively, elevated oxidative biomarkers and reduced antioxidant capacity support a role for oxidative stress as a mechanistic driver of both cardiovascular and ND progression.

Nutrition as a modifiable risk factor for noncommunicable diseases with therapeutic potential

Diet, and more particularly dietary patterns rich in health-promoting foods, are increasingly recognised as key modifiable determinants of both cardiovascular and ND trajectories (71, 72). Large cohort studies consistently show that dietary patterns emphasizing fruits and vegetables, whole grains, nuts, fish, and unsaturated fats have been associated with reduced incidence of major cardiovascular events, better cardiometabolic profiles, and lower risk of cognitive decline and dementia (73–75). Within this context, functional or nootropic foods should not be viewed as isolated “magic bullets,” but rather as foods and food matrices that deliver bioactive components capable of targeting shared mechanisms, including dyslipidaemia, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and chronic low-grade inflammation. By acting on these convergent pathways, brain health-promoting functional foods have the potential to simultaneously modify vascular risk and neurodegenerative processes across the lifespan (76–78).

Positioning such foods within evidence-based dietary patterns, rather than as standalone commercial products, offers a realistic, mechanistically grounded avenue to influence the onset, progression, and possibly treatment response or disease trajectory of both cardiovascular and ND. However, some heritable ND diseases are unlikely to respond substantially to nutritional intervention alone, although nutrition may still provide supportive benefits. Representative dietary models including the Mediterranean (79, 80), DASH (81, 82), and MIND (83, 84) diets consistently demonstrate benefits for cardiometabolic health and are increasingly associated with reduced risk of cognitive decline and dementia.

Anti-inflammatory roles of nutrients in cardiovascular diseases

A substantial body of evidence supports the role of nutrients and bioactive compounds in modulating inflammatory pathways central to CVD. Many cardioprotective nutrients exert pleiotropic effects, including suppression of pro-inflammatory signalling, improvement of endothelial function, inhibition of platelet aggregation and promotion of inflammatory resolution (85, 86). Several nutrient classes have been investigated for their anti-inflammatory effects preclinically and clinically. Here, we discuss nutrients with shared relevance to CVD and ND.

Long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), are among the most extensively studied. Incorporated into cell membranes, they influence membrane dynamics and signalling pathways, and act as precursors to specialised pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), including resolvins and protectins, which are thought to actively initiate resolution of inflammation (87). These effects are associated with reduced inflammatory markers, inhibition of NF-κB activation, and improved vascular function (88). EPA and DHA in phospholipid forms may exert more potent anti-inflammatory effects due to greater bioavailability (89) and these types of lipids have been implicated in the prevention of the pro-inflammatory effects of bioactive lipids such as platelet-activating factor (PAF) through antagonistic effects in both CVD (90) and ND (18). Generally in the field, dose and formulation inconsistencies remain unresolved regarding which formulations may exert the greatest benefits (91–93). Furthermore, trial findings on the cognitive benefits of omega-3 fatty acids remain mixed (94, 95).

Another promising dietary component in the prevention of CVD and ND is fibre, particularly fermentable forms, which exert anti-inflammatory effects via the gut microbiota. Microbial fermentation produces short-chain fatty acids, which regulate immune responses and enhance gut barrier integrity, limiting endotoxin-driven inflammation (96, 97). In particular, cereal dietary fibre intake was associated with lower levels of inflammatory markers and lower risk of CVD in over 4,000 older U.S. adults (98). However, some evidence suggests that the cardiometabolic benefits associated with short-chain fatty acids may not translate into equivalent benefits for brain health (99).

Conversely, one potential group of dietary bioactive nutrients that may also play a role in such associations are polyphenols. Polyphenols, such as flavonoids, found in plant-based foods, modulate inflammatory signalling through inhibition of NF-κB and activation of Nrf2, reducing oxidative stress and improving endothelial function (100). Decades of research have associated polyphenols with potential vascular benefits. However, polyphenols are often found in forms that have poor bioavailability, but this can be improved through methods such as encapsulation (101). Other nutrients, including vitamin D, zinc, and magnesium, also contribute to immune regulation and are associated with lower inflammatory burden, although evidence for clinical outcomes remains variable (102, 103). Zinc may also play a contributory role through its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective functions. As an essential trace element involved in redox regulation and immune signalling, zinc modulates inflammatory pathways including NF-κB activation and cytokine release (104). Perturbations in zinc homeostasis have been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease, where abnormal zinc levels may promote amyloid-β aggregation and exacerbate neuroinflammation (105). Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to several ND and to immune dysregulation associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) (106). Low serum vitamin D levels may contribute to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease by worsening amyloid-β associated neurodegeneration in older adults (107). Moreover, calcitriol, the active form of vitamin D, demonstrates anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties in Parkinson’s disease, potentially mediated through its ability to enhance the expansion of regulatory T cells in mice (108, 109). Another class of nutrients with established links to both CVD and ND are B vitamins, particularly folate, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, which are central to one-carbon metabolism and regulation of homocysteine. Elevated homocysteine is recognised as a modifiable risk factor associated with vascular dysfunction through mechanisms involving oxidative stress, endothelial damage, and inflammatory signalling. In the central nervous system, increased homocysteine has been implicated in neurotoxicity and is associated with processes relevant to neurodegeneration, including promotion of amyloid-β accumulation and tau-related pathology. Importantly, the evidence supports a causal role for homocysteine in disease progression, with B vitamin supplementation shown to lower homocysteine levels and potentially contribute to disease prevention, particularly when implemented at earlier stages (110). These findings suggest that maintaining adequate B vitamin status may be important for modulating inflammation-mediated vascular and neurodegenerative pathways.

Together, these nutrients act within dietary patterns rich in unsaturated fats, fibre, and plant bioactives. Their combined effects on inflammatory pathways represent a key mechanism linking diet to cardiovascular risk, with potential relevance for neurovascular and neurodegenerative health.

Functional foods and product development for cardiovascular diseases

Over the past decades, functional foods targeting cardiovascular risk have been developed around several well-characterized mechanisms, including cholesterol reduction, blood pressure control, antithrombotic effects, and improvement of endothelial function (111–113). Examples include foods fortified with long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, plant sterols and stanols, fibre, and specific bioactive peptides, often delivered through spreads, dairy and dairy analogue products, cereal products, and beverages (112, 114). These products have typically been evaluated against conventional cardiovascular endpoints, such as LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, and markers of platelet activation, with many demonstrating modest but clinically meaningful improvements in risk factors when incorporated into habitual diets. However, most cardiovascular-oriented functional foods have been conceptualized with a single organ focus, rarely considering neurocognitive outcomes or neurovascular health (111, 115). Given the intimate links between cardiometabolic status, vascular integrity, and brain function, there is an opportunity to redesign and reevaluate cardiovascular functional foods using dual cardiovascular and neurocognitive endpoints (115, 116). Future product development should explicitly consider how lipid profiles, anti-inflammatory effects, and endothelial benefits induced by these foods might translate into preservation of cognitive function and reduced risk of ND, thereby bridging traditional “heart healthy” claims with emerging brain health–promoting potential given the strong cardio-neuro associations discussed here.

Nutrient roles in neurodegenerative diseases

In contrast to the relatively mature field of nutrition and cardiovascular disease, nutritional strategies for ND such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and vascular dementia remain fragmented and comparatively underdeveloped (117–119). Much of the current evidence for diet and neurodegeneration arises from observational studies, which, although informative, are vulnerable to confounding, reverse causation, and difficulties capturing long-term dietary patterns (119). Interventional studies have often focused on single nutrients or high-dose supplements, such as isolated vitamins, antioxidants, or omega-3 capsules, with generally modest and sometimes inconsistent effects on cognitive outcomes (120, 121). Moreover, trials frequently enrol heterogeneous populations with respect to disease stage, vascular comorbidities, and genetic background, and they rarely integrate comprehensive vascular endpoints or neuroimaging markers to clarify mechanisms (122, 123). There is also limited attention to real-world issues such as food format, palatability, and cultural acceptability, which are critical for adherence among specific populations, such as the aging population or cognitively impaired individuals (124, 125). Collectively, these gaps highlight the need to move beyond single-nutrient, supplement-driven approaches towards rigorously designed, food- and pattern-based interventions that explicitly target shared vascular and neurodegenerative pathways over sufficiently long timeframes.

Functional foods targeting neurodegenerative diseases (ND)

Despite current limitations in nutritional strategies for ND, several dietary patterns and food categories show promise as brain health-promoting functional or nootropic foods. Patterns such as the Mediterranean and MIND diets, characterized by high intakes of fruits and vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, fish, and extra-virgin olive oil, alongside reduced consumption of saturated fats and ultra-processed foods, have been consistently associated with slower cognitive decline and reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia (80, 84). These dietary patterns provide a complex matrix of unsaturated lipids, polyphenols, vitamins, and minerals that influence neuronal membrane composition, synaptic plasticity, neuroinflammatory signalling, and vascular function. Within these patterns, specific food groups appear particularly relevant. Marine foods and other sources of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids support neuronal integrity and contribute to the formation of the controversial (126) pro-resolving lipid mediators involved in vascular and neuroinflammatory regulation (127). Standalone, long-chain omega-3 fatty acids and phospholipid preparations are under investigation to tackle NDs (91, 117, 128). Polyphenol-rich foods, including berries, cocoa, olives, and herbs, exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects while modulating endothelial function, mitochondrial health, and cellular aging (129). While the potential antioxidant effects of polyphenol-rich sources are often touted as potential strategies to target ND, human studies have largely led to mixed or negative conclusions (130, 131), potentially because of their known poor bioavailability (101). Fermented and fibre-rich foods are also thought to contribute nutrients with neuroprotective effects by influencing the gut–brain axis and systemic inflammation, although mechanistic and clinical evidence in ND contexts remains limited (132). In the context of brain health, it is worth noting that some of these functional foods and their bioactive components are often described as “nootropic” in popular discussions; however, their effects extend beyond cognition, learning, and memory. Rather, they act through pathways central to both cardiovascular and neurodegenerative health, including lipid metabolism, endothelial function, and chronic inflammation (22). Accordingly, “nootropic foods” are better conceptualized within broader dietary strategies that integrate cardiometabolic and neuroprotective benefits, highlighting the need for evaluation using combined vascular and neurocognitive endpoints.

Future directions and limitations

Despite common mechanisms in NCD, there is no magic bullet to tackle these complex conditions. However, it is clear that there are nutritional strategies that may reduce the risk of conditions associated with systemic inflammation, including NCD like ND and CVD. These strategies are highlighted in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Infographic illustrating the relationship between dietary and functional components, biological mechanisms, and health outcomes. It outlines nutrients like omega-3, vitamins, fiber, and minerals, showing their impact on mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid regulation, neurovascular integrity, vascular function, and the brain-heart-gut axis, ultimately leading to cardiovascular and cognitive benefits and promoting healthy aging.

Dietary interventions and bioactive nutrients target shared pathways to improve cardiovascular and neurodegenerative health. Abbreviations: BBB, brain–blood barrier; CRP, C-reactive protein; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IL-6, interleukin-6; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; NO, nitric oxide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-alpha.

Personalized nutritional strategies for non-communicable diseases

As evidence accumulates for the role of diet in modulating both cardiovascular and neurodegenerative risk, the next step is to move from ‘one size fits all’ recommendations toward more personalized nutritional strategies, particularly when implemented earlier in life before disease onset. Advances in nutrigenetics, metabolomics, lipidomics, and microbiome research offer the potential to identify subgroups that are particularly responsive or resistant to specific dietary patterns or functional food interventions (133, 134). For example, genetic variants related to lipid transport, inflammation, or amyloid processing, as well as baseline cardiometabolic profiles, may modulate individual responses to diets rich in unsaturated fats, marine foods, or polyphenol-dense plant foods (135, 136). Integrating these biological signatures with granular dietary data and digital health tools may allow tailoring of brain health-promoting functional foods to an individual’s vascular risk, cognitive status, and lifestyle context within an integrated cardio-neuro framework (137). Future trials should, therefore, incorporate stratified designs to evaluate how personalized combinations of foods and dietary patterns influence both cardiovascular markers and cognitive or neurobiological outcomes. Such an approach could help to optimize efficacy, minimize unnecessary supplementation, and move functional and nootropic foods from generic “heart healthy” or “brain healthy” labels toward truly targeted interventions along the cardio–neuro continuum, and strategically aimed at potentially reducing systemic inflammation.

One converging theme across NCDs is the emerging concept of a gut-brain-heart axis in which gut microbiota-derived metabolites act as systemic mediators linking vascular, inflammatory, and neurodegenerative pathology (138, 139). Dysbiosis and increased gut permeability facilitate the escape of microbially derived metabolites such as SCFAs and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) into the circulation, where they modulate endothelial function, neurohumoral signalling, and neuroinflammation (140, 141). SCFAs (i.e., acetate, propionate, and butyrate) are generally regarded as beneficial metabolites that support barrier integrity, promote regulatory immune responses, and dampen pro-inflammatory cytokine production (142, 143). In contrast, elevated TMAO, arising from microbial metabolism of dietary choline and carnitine to trimethylamine (TMA), has been reproducibly associated with incident cardiovascular events, vascular dysfunction, and mortality, and is increasingly linked to cognitive decline and vascular cognitive impairment through effects on endothelial injury, cholesterol handling, and neuroinflammatory pathways (144–147). Against this background, diet emerges as a key modifiable lever: high-fiber, plant-rich and fermented-food dietary patterns promote SCFA-producing taxa and a more favorable metabolite profile, whereas Western diets enriched in red and processed meat increase TMA precursors, foster dysbiosis, and raise TMAO levels, suggesting that microbiome-directed nutritional strategies may help to attenuate gut-brain-heart axis-mediated cardiovascular and neurodegenerative risk (144, 148). Furthermore, as demonstrated in the patent landscape, there is increased interest in developing probiotics and similar products that target gut dysbiosis and inflammatory diseases that may benefit the cardio-neuro axis (149).

Current limitations and potential for new functional foods and nutritional strategies

Taken together, the current evidence base supports an increasingly coherent role for brain health-promoting functional foods in shaping the risk and progression of both cardiovascular and ND, but several limitations must be acknowledged. Many studies are observational, rely on self-reported dietary intake, and are conducted within specific cultural or socioeconomic contexts that may limit generalizability (150, 151). Interventional trials are often short in duration relative to the long prodromal phase of neurodegenerative disorders, focus on single nutrients rather than whole food matrices, and frequently lack integrated assessment of vascular and neurocognitive outcomes (120, 122, 152). Regulatory frameworks and commercial pressures often promote narrow, claim-focused product development rather than fostering mechanistically grounded, clinically meaningful innovation (153, 154). Despite these challenges, the convergence of mechanistic, epidemiological, and early interventional data suggests substantial potential for functional or nootropic foods, beverages, and/or dietary patterns rich in unsaturated lipids, fibre, and bioactive plant compounds to modulate shared inflammatory and lipid-related pathways across cardiovascular and neurodegenerative conditions. Realizing this potential will require well-designed, long-term studies, thoughtful product development, and a shift from marketing-oriented concepts toward rigorous, validated health-promoting dietary strategies embedded in everyday food environments and traditions.

Furthermore, future progress in this area will require interdisciplinary collaboration among cardiologists, neurologists, nutrition scientists, systems biologists, microbiome researchers, and public health experts. Integrated research frameworks combining dietary assessment, vascular biomarkers, neuroimaging, multiomics approaches, and clinical outcomes will be essential for validating the proposed cardio-neuro axis and translating mechanistic insights into effective prevention and intervention strategies. Such collaborative efforts may help accelerate the development of personalized nutritional approaches that simultaneously target cardiovascular and neurodegenerative health across the life course.

In conclusion, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases have traditionally been considered distinct clinical entities, yet accumulating evidence indicates that they share interconnected inflammatory, vascular, metabolic, and lipid-mediated mechanisms. We propose that these interactions can be conceptualized as a cardio-neuro axis, providing a framework for understanding how dietary exposures influence both cardiovascular and brain health across the life course. Although nutritional strategies for cardiovascular disease are comparatively mature, translation to neurodegenerative disease remains fragmented and frequently focused on isolated nutrients rather than integrated dietary patterns. Future studies should adopt whole-diet approaches, incorporate vascular and neurocognitive endpoints, and leverage emerging personalized nutrition and multiomics tools. Embedding nutrition within a unified cardio-neuro framework may offer a scalable and mechanistically grounded strategy to reduce the growing burden of NCDs.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. RL was supported under the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions grant agreement No. 101179447 (M1NDRHYTHM).

Footnotes

Edited by: Ravi Bansal, University of Southern California, United States

Reviewed by: Sandeep Kumar, Tulane University, United States

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author contributions

DC: Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. N-LI: Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RT: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. NS: Validation, Writing – review & editing. AG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. IZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RE: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The authors RL, AG, and IZ declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.World Health Organisation. (2025). Noncommunicable diseases. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (Accessed May 1, 2026).
  • 2.Khalil M, Lau HC, Thackeray JT, Mikail N, Gebhard C, Quyyumi AA, et al. Heart-brain axis: pushing the boundaries of cardiovascular molecular imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. (2024) 36:101870. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.101870, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Toyli A, Shaik A, Zhao C, Chen Q-H, Sha Q, Zhou W. The heart-brain axis: unraveling the interconnections between cardiovascular and Alzheimer’s diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2025) 12. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1685461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tardo DT, Cortes-Canteli M, Fuster V, Sachdev PS, Kovacic JC. The heart-brain-metabolism Axis in cardiovascular and neurologic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2025) 86:2663–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1602, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alzheimer’s Disease International. (2022). Dementia statistics. Available online at: https://www.alzint.org/about/dementia-facts-figures/dementia-statistics/ (Accessed May 1, 2026).
  • 6.Corrada MM, Brookmeyer R, Paganini-Hill A, Berlau D, Kawas CH. Dementia incidence continues to increase with age in the oldest old: the 90+ study. Ann Neurol. (2010) 67:114–21. doi: 10.1002/ana.21915, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Su D, Cui Y, He C, Yin P, Bai R, Zhu J, et al. Projections for prevalence of Parkinson’s disease and its driving factors in 195 countries and territories to 2050: modelling study of global burden of disease study 2021. BMJ. (2025) 388:e080952. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080952, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khan KG, Kaur P, Bhagat M, Klair HK, Bakhtawar M, Saldaña JMA, et al. Effect of statin therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. (2025) 17:e88238. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88238, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organisation. (2025) Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed May 1, 2026).
  • 10.Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks 2023 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2023. JACC. (2025) 86:2167–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.015, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu E, Malik VS, Hu FB. Cardiovascular disease prevention by diet modification: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 72:914–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.085, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miller M, Aggarwal M, Allen K, Bhattacharya R, Dastmalchi LN, Kris-Etherton PM, et al. A clinician’s guide for trending cardiovascular nutritional controversies in 2026. JACC Adv. (2026) 5:102591. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102591, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Raza ML, Bhojani A, Batool SK, Zehra D. Non pharmacoligical approaches for neurodegenerative diseases: a narrative review. Exp Gerontol. (2024) 198:112620. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112620, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tuigunov D, Sinyavskiy Y, Nurgozhin T, Zholdassova Z, Smagul G, Omarov Y, et al. Precision nutrition and gut–brain Axis modulation in the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. Nutrients. (2025) 17:3068. doi: 10.3390/nu17193068, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Claro-Cala CM, Rivero-Pino F, Torrecillas-López M, Jimenez-Gonzalez V, Montserrat-de la Paz S. Immunonutrition: future perspective in neurodegenerative disorders. Nutr Neurosci. (2025) 28:807–18. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2024.2425565, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Andújar-Vera F, García-Fontana C, Sanabria-de la Torre R, González-Salvatierra S, Martínez-Heredia L, Iglesias-Baena I, et al. Identification of potential targets linked to the cardiovascular/Alzheimer’s Axis through bioinformatics approaches. Biomedicine. (2022) 10:389. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020389, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen L, Deng H, Cui H, Fang J, Zuo Z, Deng J, et al. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget. (2017) 9:7204–18. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23208, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tsoupras A, Lordan R, Zabetakis I. Inflammation, not cholesterol, is a cause of chronic disease. Nutrients. (2018) 10:604. doi: 10.3390/nu10050604, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chopra AS, Lordan R, Horbańczuk OK, Atanasov AG, Chopra I, Horbańczuk JO, et al. The current use and evolving landscape of nutraceuticals. Pharmacol Res. (2022) 175:106001. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.106001, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lordan R, Rando HM, COVID-19 review Consortium. Greene CS. Dietary supplements and nutraceuticals under investigation for COVID-19 prevention and treatment. mSystems. (2021) 6:e00122-21. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00122-21, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Santini A, Cammarata SM, Capone G, Ianaro A, Tenore GC, Pani L, et al. Nutraceuticals: opening the debate for a regulatory framework. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2018) 84:659–72. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13496, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nguyen LAM, Simons CW, Thomas R. Nootropic foods in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanisms, challenges, and future. Translational Neurodegeneration. (2025) 14:17. doi: 10.1186/s40035-025-00476-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tsoupras A, Zabetakis I, Lordan R. "Chapter 14 - functional foods: growth, evolution, legislation, and future perspectives". In: Zabetakis I, Tsoupras A, Lordan R, Ramji D, editors. London, United Kingdom: Functional Foods and their Implications for Health Promotion Academic Press; (2023). p. 367–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Komala MG, Ong SG, Qadri MU, Elshafie LM, Pollock CA, Saad S. Investigating the regulatory process, safety, efficacy and product transparency for nutraceuticals in the USA, Europe and Australia. Foods. (2023) 12:427. doi: 10.3390/foods12020427, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lordan R. Dietary supplements and nutraceuticals market growth during the coronavirus pandemic - implications for consumers and regulatory oversight. PharmaNutrition. (2021) 18:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.phanu.2021.100282, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meijer GW, Lähteenmäki L, Stancu V. Impact of health claims: what has been achieved and what is the future? Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2023) 63:11561–9. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2094339, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Katan MB. Health claims for functional foods. BMJ. (2004) 328:180–1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.180, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fredman G, Li Y, Dalli J, Chiang N, Serhan CN. Self-limited versus delayed resolution of acute inflammation: temporal regulation of pro-resolving mediators and MicroRNA. Sci Rep. (2012) 2:639. doi: 10.1038/srep00639, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Amin MN, Siddiqui SA, Ibrahim M, Hakim ML, Ahammed MS, Kabir A, et al. Inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and cancer. SAGE Open Medicine. (2020) 8:2050312120965752. doi: 10.1177/2050312120965752, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Seong SJ, Kim KW, Song JY, Park KJ, Jo YT, Han JH, et al. Inflammatory cytokines and cognition in Alzheimer’s disease and its prodrome. Psychiatry Investig. (2024) 21:1054–64. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0071, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. (2002) 105:1135–43. doi: 10.1161/hc0902.104353, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ajoolabady A, Pratico D, Lin L, Mantzoros CS, Bahijri S, Tuomilehto J, et al. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: pathophysiology and mechanisms. Cell Death Dis. (2024) 15:817. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-07166-8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang Z, Liu M, Shi Y, Lu Z, Lu Z, Lin Y, et al. Upregulation of IL-32γ in endothelial cells promotes macrophage recruitment and inflammatory progression in atherosclerosis. Sci Rep. (2026) 16:11262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-40151-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Anti-inflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:1119–31. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1707914, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lordan R, Tsoupras A, Zabetakis I. Platelet activation and prothrombotic mediators at the nexus of inflammation and atherosclerosis: potential role of antiplatelet agents. Blood Rev. (2021) 45:100694. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100694, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liberale L, Montecucco F, Schwarz L, Lüscher TF, Camici GG. Inflammation and cardiovascular diseases: lessons from seminal clinical trials. Cardiovasc Res. (2021) 117:411–22. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa211, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Huang X, Hussain B, Chang J. Peripheral inflammation and blood–brain barrier disruption: effects and mechanisms. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2021) 27:36–47. doi: 10.1111/cns.13569, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rao JS, Kellom M, Kim H-W, Rapoport SI, Reese EA. Neuroinflammation and synaptic loss. Neurochem Res. (2012) 37:903–10. doi: 10.1007/s11064-012-0708-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang X. A bridge between the innate immunity system and amyloid-β production in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Bull. (2021) 37:898–901. doi: 10.1007/s12264-021-00691-y, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang R, Ren H, Kaznacheyeva E, Lu X, Wang G. Association of Glial Activation and α-Synuclein pathology in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Bull. (2023) 39:479–90. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00957-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang F, Jiang L. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2015) 11:243–56. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S75546, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Heneka MT, Carson MJ, Khoury JE, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurology. (2015) 14:388–405. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70016-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grozdanov V, Bousset L, Hoffmeister M, Bliederhaeuser C, Meier C, Madiona K, et al. Increased immune activation by pathologic α-Synuclein in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. (2019) 86:593–606. doi: 10.1002/ana.25557, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lyra P, Machado V, Rota S, Chaudhuri KR, Botelho J, Mendes JJ. Revisiting alpha-Synuclein pathways to inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087137, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jaime Garcia D, Chagnot A, Wardlaw JM, Montagne A. A scoping review on biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in small vessel disease: molecular insights from human studies. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:13114. doi: 10.3390/ijms241713114, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fahim MA, Yao Y, Tipparaju SM, Xuan W. The heart-brain crosstalk in age related cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Fluids Barriers CNS. (2025) 22:89. doi: 10.1186/s12987-025-00700-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Moyse E, Krantic S, Djellouli N, Roger S, Angoulvant D, Debacq C, et al. Neuroinflammation: a possible link between chronic vascular disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. (2022) 14 2022. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.827263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mesa-Herrera F, Taoro-González L, Valdés-Baizabal C, Diaz M, Marín R. Lipid and lipid raft alteration in aging and neurodegenerative diseases: a window for the development of new biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:3810. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153810, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Salas YM, Kemper KM, Shanmughapriya S, Langford D, Natarajaseenivasan K. Lipid metabolism and neurodegeneration: mechanistic insights and therapeutic targets. Ageing Res Rev. (2026) 118:103114. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2026.103114, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Soda T, Pasqua T, De Sarro G, Moccia F. Cognitive impairment and synaptic dysfunction in cardiovascular disorders: the new Frontiers of the heart–brain Axis. Biomedicine. (2024) 12:2387. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102387, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Abahussin HM, Alotaibi MS, Alhazzaa OA, Alotaibi AG, Alsaab SM, Aljawini NA, et al. Exploring the intricate link between gut microbiota dysbiosis and the aging process: implications for age-related diseases. Gut Pathog. (2025) 18:3. doi: 10.1186/s13099-025-00788-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yue C, Fu Y, Zhao Y, Ou Y, Sun Y, Tan L. Association between Alzheimer’s disease and metabolic syndrome: unveiling the role of dyslipidemia mechanisms. Brain Netw Disord. (2025) 1:21–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bnd.2024.10.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jin S, Kang PM. A systematic review on advances in management of oxidative stress-associated cardiovascular diseases. Antioxidants (Basel). (2024) 13. doi: 10.3390/antiox13080923, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rekatsina M, Paladini A, Piroli A, Zis P, Pergolizzi JV, Varrassi G. Pathophysiology and therapeutic perspectives of oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases: a narrative review. Adv Ther. (2020) 37:113–39. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01148-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ismail A, Al-Kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, Alexiou A, Papadakis M, Faheem SA, et al. Unveiling the neuroprotective effect of paraoxonase 1 in neurodegenerative diseases focusing on Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurobiol. (2025) 63:244. doi: 10.1007/s12035-025-05493-1, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Petrič B, Kramberger MG, Dolžan V, Emeršič A, Goličnik M, Leonardi A, et al. The role of age and sex in paraoxonase 1 activity in patients with Alzheimer's dementia. Chem Biol Interact. (2025) 422:111787. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111787, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bounafaa A, Berrougui H, Ghalim N, Nasser B, Bagri A, Moujahid A, et al. Association between Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) polymorphisms and the risk of acute coronary syndrome in a north African population. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0133719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133719, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rathore AWH, Naveed H, Nadeem A, Ishaque A, Iqbal S, Ilyas U, et al. Relationship between the oxidative stress biomarkers and coronary heart disease: pathogenesis to therapeutic aspects. World J Cardiol. (2026) 18:113624. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i2.113624, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Thakkar H, Chatterjee S, Verma A, Chandrasekar N, Khairnar A, Shah RP. Malondialdehyde mediated alpha-synuclein aggregation: a plausible etiology of parkinson’s disease in oxidative stress. Chem Res Toxicol. (2025) 38:573–82. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00348, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cecchi C, Fiorillo C, Sorbi S, Latorraca S, Nacmias B, Bagnoli S, et al. Oxidative stress and reduced antioxidant defenses in peripheral cells from familial Alzheimer’s patients. Free Radic Biol Med. (2002) 33:1372–9. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01049-3, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen K, Kazachkov M, Yu P. Effect of aldehydes derived from oxidative deamination and oxidative stress on β-amyloid aggregation; pathological implications to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neural Transm. (2007) 114:835–9. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0697-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang S, Binder P, Fang Q, Wang Z, Xiao W, Liu W, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in the heart: insights into mechanisms and drug targets. Br J Pharmacol. (2018) 175:1293–304. doi: 10.1111/bph.13888, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Peggion C, Calì T, Brini M. Mitochondria dysfunction and Neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration: who comes first? Antioxidants (Basel). (2024) 13. doi: 10.3390/antiox13020240, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen C, Dong X, Zhang W, Chang X, Gao W. Dialogue between mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum-potential therapeutic targets for age-related cardiovascular diseases. Front Pharmacol. (2024) 15:1389202. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1389202, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yoshida H, Kisugi R. Mechanisms of LDL oxidation. Clin Chim Acta. (2010) 411:1875–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.038, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu M, Chen R, Zheng Z, Xu S, Hou C, Ding Y, et al. Mechanisms of inflammatory microenvironment formation in cardiometabolic diseases: molecular and cellular perspectives. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2025) 11:1529903. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1529903, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Trofin D-M, Sardaru D-P, Trofin D, Onu I, Tutu A, Onu A, et al. Oxidative stress in brain function. Antioxidants (Basel). (2025) 14:297. doi: 10.3390/antiox14030297, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ihuoma J, Milan M, Negri S, Troyano-Rodriguez E, Rudraboina R, Kosmider A, et al. LDL oxidation and cerebrovascular aging: mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. Redox Biol. (2026) 92:104118. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104118, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Beretti F, Malenchini M, Gatti M, Maraldi T. Oxidative stress as a central mechanistic bridge between Alzheimer’s and vascular pathologies in mixed dementia: emerging evidence and therapeutic perspectives. Biomedicine. (2025) 14:59. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines14010059, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chinta SJ, Andersen JK. Redox imbalance in Parkinson's disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. (2008) 1780:1362–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.02.005, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Xiao Y-L, Gong Y, Qi Y-J, Shao Z-M, Jiang Y-Z. Effects of dietary intervention on human diseases: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:59. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01771-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Fry JL, Anderson KR. Association between nutrition, diet quality, dietary patterns, and human health and diseases. Nutrients. (2025) 17:3. doi: 10.3390/nu17010003, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Georgoulis M, Damigou E, Chrysohoou C, Barkas F, Anastasiou G, Kravvariti E, et al. Mediterranean diet trajectories and 20-year incidence of cardiovascular disease: the ATTICA cohort study (2002–2022). Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2024) 34:153–66. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.09.019, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fatima G, Dalmadi I, Süllős G, Takács K, Halmy E. Dietary patterns for health-span and longevity: a comprehensive review of nutritional strategies promoting lifelong wellness. Appl Sci. (2025) 15:12013. doi: 10.3390/app152212013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Puri S, Shaheen M, Grover B. Nutrition and cognitive health: a life course approach. Front Public Health. (2023) 11 2023. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1023907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhang X, Zeng Q, He W. From broad-spectrum health to targeted prevention: a review of functional foods in chronic disease management. Molecules. (2026) 31:103. doi: 10.3390/molecules31010103, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Arshad Z, Shahid S, Hasnain A, Yaseen E, Rahimi M. Functional foods enriched with bioactive compounds: therapeutic potential and technological innovations. Food Sci Nutr. (2025) 13:e71024. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.71024, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Velissaridou A, Panoutsopoulou E, Prokopiou V, Tsoupras A. Cardio-protective-promoting properties of functional foods inducing HDL-cholesterol levels and functionality. Nutraceuticals. (2024) 4:469–502. doi: 10.3390/nutraceuticals4040028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Estruch R, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Corella D, Salas-Salvado J, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Covas MI, et al. Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on cardiovascular risk factors: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. (2006) 145:1–11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-1-200607040-00004, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Fekete M, Varga P, Ungvari Z, Fekete JT, Buda A, Szappanos Á, et al. The role of the Mediterranean diet in reducing the risk of cognitive impairement, dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. GeroScience. (2025) 47:3111–30. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01488-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Appel LJ, Brands MW, Daniels SR, Karanja N, Elmer PJ, Sacks FM. Dietary approaches to prevent and treat hypertension. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. (2006) 47:296–308. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000202568.01167.b6, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Salehi-Abargouei A, Maghsoudi Z, Shirani F, Azadbakht L. Effects of dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH)-style diet on fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular diseases—incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis on observational prospective studies. Nutrition. (2013) 29:611–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.12.018, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Morgan KH, Lee ML, Barroso CS, Anderson JG, Lott S, Reth D, et al. Associations of the MIND diet with human health outcomes: a scoping review. Nutrients. (2025) 17. doi: 10.3390/nu17162687, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Morris MC, Tangney CC, Wang Y, Sacks FM, Barnes LL, Bennett DA, et al. MIND diet slows cognitive decline with aging. Alzheimers Dement. (2015) 11:1015–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.011, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Behl T, Bungau S, Kumar K, Zengin G, Khan F, Kumar A, et al. Pleotropic effects of polyphenols in cardiovascular system. Biomed Pharmacother. (2020) 130:110714. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110714, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Młynarska E, Hajdys J, Czarnik W, Fularski P, Leszto K, Majchrowicz G, et al. The role of antioxidants in the therapy of cardiovascular diseases—a literature review. Nutrients. (2024) 16:2587. doi: 10.3390/nu16162587, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Djuricic I, Calder PC. N-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) and cardiovascular health - updated review of mechanisms and clinical outcomes. Curr Atheroscler Rep. (2025) 27:116. doi: 10.1007/s11883-025-01363-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bodur M, Yilmaz B, Ağagündüz D, Ozogul Y. Immunomodulatory effects of Omega-3 fatty acids: mechanistic insights and health implications. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2025) 69:e202400752. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202400752, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lordan R, Redfern S, Tsoupras A, Zabetakis I. Inflammation and cardiovascular disease: are marine phospholipids the answer? Food Funct. (2020) 11:2861–85. doi: 10.1039/C9FO01742A, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Harishkumar R, Hans S, Stanton JE, Grabrucker AM, Lordan R, Zabetakis I. Targeting the platelet-activating factor receptor (PAF-R): antithrombotic and anti-atherosclerotic nutrients. Nutrients. (2022) 14:4414. doi: 10.3390/nu14204414, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Caffrey C, Leamy A, O’Sullivan E, Zabetakis I, Lordan R, Nasopoulou C. Cardiovascular diseases and marine oils: a focus on Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and polar lipids. Mar Drugs. (2023) 21:549. doi: 10.3390/md21110549, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Dempsey M, Rockwell MS, Wentz LM. The influence of dietary and supplemental omega-3 fatty acids on the omega-3 index: a scoping review. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:1072653. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1072653, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hilleman DE, Wiggins BS, Bottorff MB. Critical differences between dietary supplement and prescription Omega-3 fatty acids: a narrative review. Adv Ther. (2020) 37:656–70. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01211-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Shahinfar H, Yazdian Z, Avini NA, Torabinasab K, Shab-Bidar S. A systematic review and dose response meta analysis of omega 3 supplementation on cognitive function. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:30610. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16129-8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Andriambelo B, Stiffel M, Roke K, Plourde M. New perspectives on randomized controlled trials with omega-3 fatty acid supplements and cognition: a scoping review. Ageing Res Rev. (2023) 85:101835. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101835, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Liu X-f, Shao J-h, Liao Y-T, Wang L-N, Jia Y, Dong P-j, et al. Regulation of short-chain fatty acids in the immune system. Front Immunol. (2023) 14 2023. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1186892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chen N, Wu J, Wang J, Piri N, Chen F, Xiao T, et al. Short chain fatty acids inhibit endotoxin-induced uveitis and inflammatory responses of retinal astrocytes. Exp Eye Res. (2021) 206:108520. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108520, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Shivakoti R, Biggs ML, Djoussé L, Durda PJ, Kizer JR, Psaty B, et al. Intake and sources of dietary Fiber, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease in older US adults. JAMA Netw Open. (2022) 5:e225012–2. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5012, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Fillier TA, Shah S, Doody KM, Pham TH, Aubry I, Tremblay ML, et al. Brief exposure of neuronal cells to levels of SCFAs observed in human systemic circulation impair lipid metabolism resulting in apoptosis. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:14355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18363-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bas TG. Dietary polyphenols (flavonoids) derived from plants for use in therapeutic health: antioxidant performance, ROS, molecular mechanisms, and bioavailability limitations. Int J Mol Sci. (2026) 27:1404. doi: 10.3390/ijms27031404, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Williamson G. Bioavailability of food polyphenols: current state of knowledge. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. (2025) 16:315–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-060721-023817, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ashique S, Kumar S, Hussain A, Mishra N, Garg A, Gowda BHJ, et al. A narrative review on the role of magnesium in immune regulation, inflammation, infectious diseases, and cancer. J Health Popul Nutr. (2023) 42:74. doi: 10.1186/s41043-023-00423-0, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Artusa P, White JH. Vitamin D and its analogs in immune system regulation. Pharmacol Rev. (2025) 77:100032. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmr.2024.100032, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Jarosz M, Olbert M, Wyszogrodzka G, Młyniec K, Librowski T. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of zinc. Zinc-dependent NF-κB signaling. Inflammopharmacology. (2017) 25:11–24. doi: 10.1007/s10787-017-0309-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Liu S, Wang N, Long Y, Wu Z, Zhou S. Zinc homeostasis: an emerging therapeutic target for Neuroinflammation related diseases. Biomolecules. (2023) 13:416. doi: 10.3390/biom13030416, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Li Y, Xu Y, Pei X, Liu Z, Gao D, Ma L, et al. Vitamin D status, supplementation, and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. (2026) 17. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1775270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Park J, Byun MS, Yi D, Ahn H, Jung JH, Kong N, et al. The moderating effect of serum vitamin D on the relationship between beta-amyloid deposition and neurodegeneration. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. (2024) 22:646–54. doi: 10.9758/cpn.24.1189, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Savran Z, Baltaci SB, Aladag T, Mogulkoc R, Baltaci AK. Vitamin D and neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): a review of current literature. Current Nutrition Reports. (2025) 14:77. doi: 10.1007/s13668-025-00663-y, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Xie Y, Chen L, Chen J, Chen Y. Calcitriol restrains microglial M1 polarization and alleviates dopaminergic degeneration in hemiparkinsonian mice by boosting regulatory T-cell expansion. Brain Behav. (2024) 14:e3373. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3373, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Smith AD, Refsum H. Homocysteine – from disease biomarker to disease prevention. J Intern Med. (2021) 290:826–54. doi: 10.1111/joim.13279, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Johnston C. Functional foods as modifiers of cardiovascular disease. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2009) 3:39S–43S. doi: 10.1177/1559827609332320, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Fogacci F, Borghi C, Cicero AFG. Functional foods and nutraceuticals to reduce the risk of Cardiometabolic disease: where we are, and where we are going. Nutrients. (2024) 16:3152. doi: 10.3390/nu16183152, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Asgary S, Rastqar A, Keshvari M. Functional food and cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment: a review. J Am Coll Nutr. (2018) 37:429–55. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2017.1410867, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Alissa EM, Ferns GA. Functional foods and nutraceuticals in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. J Nutr Metab. (2012):569486. doi: 10.1155/2012/569486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Essa MM, Bishir M, Bhat A, Chidambaram SB, Al-Balushi B, Hamdan H, et al. Functional foods and their impact on health. J Food Sci Technol. (2023) 60:820–34. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05193-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ma ZF, Liu S, Fu C, Zhou S, Lee YY. Functional foods in health promotion and disease prevention: innovations, evidence and challenges. Foods. (2026) 15:764. doi: 10.3390/foods15040764, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Fang L, Zhuang Y, Zhang M, Yang D, Zhang R, Peng J, et al. Dietary and metabolic reprogramming alleviates neurodegeneration: a review of mechanisms and clinical implications. Front Nutr. (2026) 13. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1706597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Milošević M, Arsić A, Cvetković Z, Vučić V. Memorable food: fighting age-related neurodegeneration by precision nutrition. Front Nutr. (2021) 8. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.688086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Gillette-Guyonnet S, Secher M, Vellas B. Nutrition and neurodegeneration: epidemiological evidence and challenges for future research. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2013) 75:738–55. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12058, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Johnstone AM, Albanese E, Crabtree DR, Dalile B, Grabrucker S, Gregory JM, et al. Consensus statement on exploring the Nexus between nutrition, brain health and dementia prevention. Nutrition Metabolism. (2025) 22:82. doi: 10.1186/s12986-025-00981-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Pawar A, Zabetakis I, Gavankar T, Lordan R. Milk polar lipids: untapped potential for pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. PharmaNutrition. (2023):100335. doi: 10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100335 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Mirmiran P, Bahadoran Z, Gaeini Z. Common limitations and challenges of dietary clinical trials for translation into clinical practices. International J Endocrinology Metabolism. (2021) 19:e108170. doi: 10.5812/ijem.108170, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Woolf EK, Redman LM. Exploring individual factors affecting endothelial function response variability in aging: implications for precision nutrition. Nutrients. (2025) 17:2285. doi: 10.3390/nu17142285, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Shannon OM, Lee V, Bundy R, Gillings R, Jennings A, Stephan B, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a multi-domain intervention to increase Mediterranean diet adherence and physical activity in older UK adults at risk of dementia: protocol for the MedEx-UK randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. (2021) 11:e042823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042823, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Townsend R, Fairley A, Gregory S, Ritchie C, Stevenson E, Shannon OM. Nutrition for dementia prevention: a state of the art update for clinicians. Age Ageing. (2024) 53:ii30-ii38. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae030, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Schebb NH, Kühn H, Kahnt AS, Rund KM, O’Donnell VB, Flamand N, et al. Formation, signaling and occurrence of specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators—what is the evidence so far? Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.838782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Li M, Li Z, Fan Y. Omega-3 fatty acids: multi-target mechanisms and therapeutic applications in neurodevelopmental disorders and epilepsy. Front Nutr. (2025) 12. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1598588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hans S, Stanton JE, Sauer AK, Shiels K, Saha SK, Lordan R, et al. Polar lipids modify Alzheimer’s disease pathology by reducing astrocyte pro-inflammatory signaling through platelet-activating factor receptor (PTAFR) modulation. Lipids Health Dis. (2024) 23:113. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02106-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Koca BE, Sarıtaş S, Bechelany M, Karav S. The functional role of polyphenols across the human lifespan. Int J Mol Sci. (2025) 26:11074. doi: 10.3390/ijms262211074, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Polidori MC, Nelles G. Antioxidant clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease - challenges and perspectives. Curr Pharm Des. (2014) 20:3083–92. doi: 10.2174/13816128113196660706, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Delanty N, Dichter MA. Antioxidant therapy in neurologic disease. Arch Neurol. (2000) 57:1265–70. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.9.1265, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Bodur M, Kocaadam-Bozkurt B, Bozkurt O, Aslan S, Ağagündüz D. Fermented foods and brain health: gut–brain axis mechanisms and clinical insights. J Nutr Biochem. (2026) 149:110195. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2025.110195, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Çelik E, Kocyigit E, Bingöl FG, Karaçolak C, Cemali Ö, Simonelli M, et al. Multiomics: the intersection of personalized nutrition in cardiometabolic diseases. J Transl Med. (2026) 24:363. doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-07836-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Nourazarain A, Vaziri Y. Nutrigenomics meets multi-omics: integrating genetic, metabolic, and microbiome data for personalized nutrition strategies. Genes Nutr. (2025) 20:30. doi: 10.1186/s12263-025-00790-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Yin F. Lipid metabolism and Alzheimer's disease: clinical evidence, mechanistic link and therapeutic promise. FEBS J. (2023) 290:1420–53. doi: 10.1111/febs.16344, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Silveira BKS, Oliveira TMS, Andrade PA, Hermsdorff HHM, Rosa COB, Franceschini SCC. Dietary pattern and macronutrients profile on the variation of inflammatory biomarkers: scientific update. Cardiol Res Pract. (2018):4762575. doi: 10.1155/2018/4762575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Mundt C, Yusufoğlu B, Kudenko D, Mertoğlu K, Esatbeyoglu T. AI-driven personalized nutrition: integrating omics, ethics, and digital health. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2025) 69:e70293. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.70293, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Zhang Y, Cao X, Xiong S, Zhen W, Yang Y, Gong N. An expert narrative review on the mechanisms and therapeutic potential of gut microbiota-derived metabolites in multi-organ crosstalk. Front Endocrinol. (2025) 16:1706353. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1706353, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Park KJ, Gao Y. Gut-brain axis and neurodegeneration: mechanisms and therapeutic potentials. Front Neurosci. (2024) 18. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1481390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Ney LM, Wipplinger M, Grossmann M, Engert N, Wegner VD, Mosig AS. Short chain fatty acids: key regulators of the local and systemic immune response in inflammatory diseases and infections. Open Biol. (2023) 13:230014. doi: 10.1098/rsob.230014, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Naghipour S, Cox AJ, Peart JN, Du Toit EF, Headrick JP. Trimethylamine N-oxide: heart of the microbiota–CVD nexus? Nutr Res Rev. (2021) 34:125–46. doi: 10.1017/S0954422420000177, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Xiong RG, Zhou DD, Wu SX, Huang SY, Saimaiti A, Yang ZJ, et al. Health benefits and side effects of short-chain fatty acids. Foods. (2022) 11. doi: 10.3390/foods11182863, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Vinolo MAR, Rodrigues HG, Nachbar RT, Curi R. Regulation of inflammation by short chain fatty acids. Nutrients. (2011) 3:858–76. doi: 10.3390/nu3100858, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Caradonna E, Abate F, Schiano E, Paparella F, Ferrara F, Vanoli E, et al. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) as a rising-star metabolite: implications for human health. Meta. (2025) 15. doi: 10.3390/metabo15040220, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Ding S, Xue J, Zhang Q, Zheng L. Trimethylamine-N-oxide is an important target for heart and brain diseases. Med Rev. (2021) 2:321–3. doi: 10.1515/mr-2022-0026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Li S, Shao Y, Li K, HuangFu C, Wang W, Liu Z, et al. Vascular cognitive impairment and the gut microbiota. J Alzheimer's Dis. (2018) 63:1209–22. doi: 10.3233/JAD-171103, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Mudimela S, Vishwanath NK, Pillai A, Morales R, Marrelli SP, Barichello T, et al. Clinical significance and potential role of trimethylamine N-oxide in neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. Drug Discov Today. (2022) 27:103334. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.08.002, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Coutinho-Wolino, KS de, FCLFM De Oliveira Leal, V, Mafra, D, and Stockler-Pinto, MB. Can diet modulate trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) production? What do we know so far? Eur J Nutr. (2021) 60:3567–84. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02491-6, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.El Boukhari R, Matin M, Bouissane L, Ławiński M, Lushchak O, Singla RK, et al. Enhancing human gut health: global innovations in dysbiosis management. iMeta. (2025) 4:e70028. doi: 10.1002/imt2.70028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Naska A, Lagiou A, Lagiou P. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiological research: current state of the art and future prospects. F1000Res. (2017) 6:926. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10703.1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Ravelli MN, Schoeller DA. Traditional self-reported dietary instruments are prone to inaccuracies and new approaches are needed. Front Nutr. (2020) 7. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Kumari A, Zeng X-A. Dietary bioactives in Alzheimer’s disease: a critical appraisal of clinical trials and future nutritional strategies. Nutrients. (2026) 18:907. doi: 10.3390/nu18060907, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Berciano S, Figueiredo J, Brisbois TD, Alford S, Koecher K, Eckhouse S, et al. Precision nutrition: maintaining scientific integrity while realizing market potential. Front Nutr. (2022) 9. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.979665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Belardo D, Michos ED, Blankstein R, Blumenthal RS, Ferdinand KC, Hall K, et al. Practical, evidence-based approaches to nutritional modifications to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: an American society for preventive cardiology clinical practice statement. American J Preventive Cardiology. (2022) 10:100323. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100323, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.


Articles from Frontiers in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES