Table 2.
Apical anatomical parameters according to canal type
| Parameter | Canal type | n | Mean ± SD | Median [IQR] | Min–Max | ANOVA p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apex-to-foramen distance (mm) | Distal | 50 | 0.64 ± 0.42 | 0.70 [0.50] | 0.10–1.30 | 0.040 |
| Mesiobuccal | 50 | 0.44 ± 0.15 | 0.40 [0.20] | 0.30–0.70 | ||
| Mesiolingual | 50 | 0.62 ± 0.59 | 0.20 [0.80] | 0.10–1.60 | ||
| Apical canal diameter (mm) | Distalᵃ | 50 | 0.74 ± 0.30 | 0.80 [0.30] | 0.20–1.00 | < 0.001 |
| Mesiobuccalᵇ | 50 | 0.56 ± 0.22 | 0.69 [0.40] | 0.30–0.80 | ||
| Mesiolingualᵇ | 50 | 0.59 ± 0.15 | 0.60 [0.25] | 0.40–0.80 | ||
| Roundness | Distal | 50 | 0.45 ± 0.25 | 0.40 [0.36] | 0.10–0.80 | 0.079 |
| Mesiobuccal | 50 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.50 [0.10] | 0.40–0.60 | ||
| Mesiolingual | 50 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | 0.50 [0.10] | 0.30–0.60 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median [interquartile range], and range. p-values were calculated using one-way ANOVA. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant pairwise differences according to Tukey HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05). For distance from apex, the overall ANOVA was significant, but Tukey post-hoc comparisons showed no significant pairwise differences