Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 15;26:1271. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-09231-4

Table 2.

Apical anatomical parameters according to canal type

Parameter Canal type n Mean ± SD Median [IQR] Min–Max ANOVA p-value
Apex-to-foramen distance (mm) Distal 50 0.64 ± 0.42 0.70 [0.50] 0.10–1.30 0.040
Mesiobuccal 50 0.44 ± 0.15 0.40 [0.20] 0.30–0.70
Mesiolingual 50 0.62 ± 0.59 0.20 [0.80] 0.10–1.60
Apical canal diameter (mm) Distalᵃ 50 0.74 ± 0.30 0.80 [0.30] 0.20–1.00 < 0.001
Mesiobuccalᵇ 50 0.56 ± 0.22 0.69 [0.40] 0.30–0.80
Mesiolingualᵇ 50 0.59 ± 0.15 0.60 [0.25] 0.40–0.80
Roundness Distal 50 0.45 ± 0.25 0.40 [0.36] 0.10–0.80 0.079
Mesiobuccal 50 0.52 ± 0.08 0.50 [0.10] 0.40–0.60
Mesiolingual 50 0.46 ± 0.10 0.50 [0.10] 0.30–0.60

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median [interquartile range], and range. p-values were calculated using one-way ANOVA. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant pairwise differences according to Tukey HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05). For distance from apex, the overall ANOVA was significant, but Tukey post-hoc comparisons showed no significant pairwise differences