Table 2:
Evidence from studies directly assessing the association between UPF consumption and obesity or weight change among plant-based consumers.
| Author | Country | Study design | N participant | Study population | Dietary intake assessment | Ultra-processed Food Classification | UPF Exposure estimation | Outcome-related Weight change/Obesity | NOS or CRB quality assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kahleova et al.,(48) | United Staes | Randomized Control trial | 244 participants | Overweight adults | Dietary records | The classification of ultra-processed foods was based on the NOVA classification system | UPF intake (g/day) | The randomized controlled trial involved the vegan group (avoid animal products and minimize oils) and a control group (No dietary changes). Reducing animal UPF led to weight loss: every 120 g/day decrease was linked to 1 kg weight loss over 16 weeks (p = 0.001). After adjusting for energy intake, every ~156–158 g/day reduction corresponded to 1 kg loss (p = 0.02) | Fair quality |
| Navratilova et al.,(47) | United Kingdom | Prospective Cohort | 3342 self-reported Vegetarians | UK Biobank participants | self-administered 24-h recall questionnaire | The classification of ultra-processed foods was based on the NOVA classification system | % of energy from UPFs. This study directed evaluated the research question | Participants were categorized into two groups: vegetarian PBMA consumers and vegetarian PBMA nonconsumers. UPF intake was higher among PBMA vegetarian consumers vs. non-PBMA vegetarian consumers (46% vs 40%, p=0.001), and without adjustment, the distribution of body weight differed between the 2 groups (BMI 24.9 vs 24.2, p = 0.001). PBMA intake was not associated with obesity risk (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.55–1.42, p = 0.60) after adjusting for confounding factors. | Good quality |
| Gehring et al. (41), | France | Cross-sectional | 21212 participants men =26.9% and women 73.1% | The Nutri Net-Sante cohort age > 18y, included meat-eaters = 19,812, pes-co-vegetarians = 646, vegetarians =500, and vegans =254. Subsample without meat eaters =1400. | 24-h dietary records (more than 3000 items): Completion of 3 non-consecutive 24-h dietary records for 1 weekend day and 2 weekdays. Validated by comparison with 24-hour urine and blood biomarkers | The classification of ultra-processed foods was based on the NOVA classification system. NOVA group 4 which includes plant-based meat and dairy substitutes. All food and beverages were reviewed by 3 dieticians and 5 researchers, specialists in nutritional epidemiology in 4 NOVA groups. | % of energy from UPFs. | UPF consumption was significantly higher for vegetarians (37%) and vegans (39.5%) than meat-eaters (33%), p<0.001. Across quartiles of UPFs consumption among the vegetarian subgroup (n=1400), vegetarians (β = 0.024, p=0.002) and vegans (β = 0.042, p< 0.001) had a significantly higher consumption of UPFs using pesco-vegetarians as reference. There were significant demographic differences across quartiles of UPF consumption among vegetarian subgroups (pesco-vegetarians, vegetarians, and vegans). In a significant multivariable-adjusted association obesity was a predictor of UPF consumption after controlling for duration, age, and sociodemographic characteristics. Obesity vs normal weight was associated with 0.098 greater UPF intake across quartile of UPF intake. | Fair quality |
| Dos Santos et al., (45) | Brazil | Cross-sectional | 925 vegetarians, Female =80.8% and Male =19.2% | The participants are aged 18 years and above from the Brazilian Study on Health, Diet, and Nutrition of Vegetarians | Frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Examined 29 UPF items | The classification of UPF was based on the NOVA classification system | Daily UPF consumption(times/day) | This study examined the association between UPF consumption and overweight among vegetarians. The daily UPF consumption among participants ranged from 0 to 13.1 times per day, with a median of 1.8 times. Age-sex adjusted analysis revealed a significant exposure-response relationship between UPF consumption and overweight, with a prevalence ratio (PR) of 1.09 (95% CI: 1.01-1.17) after adjusting for age (PR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04). When comparing consumption quintiles, vegetarians in Q1 (0.00-0.81 times/day) had a 22.7% overweight prevalence, while those in Q5 (3.47-13.12 times/day) showed a 28.1% prevalence. |
Good quality |
KEY: NOVA refers to the food classification system as defined by Martinez-Steele et al, (28,29) PF: ultra-processed food (includes foods and beverages), BMI: Body Mass Index [weight (kilograms)/height (meters)2], FFQ: Food frequency Questionnaire, WK: Week, %: Percentage, DASH: Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients, Kg: Kilogram, NOS: Newcastle Ottawa Scale, CRB: Cochrane Risk of bias. NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Survey