TABLE 1.
Su(var) mutation | No. of flies displaying a new y phenotype/total no. in generation:
|
% Q (F2-F7)b | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | ||
If/CyO | 1/1,100 | 2/1,320 | 0/1,560 | 1/1,820 | 0/1,920 | 2/2,440 | 1/1,469 | 0.06 |
Su(var)2-501 | 2/740 | 226/1,253 | 332/1,817 | 616/2,211 | 364/1,271 | 145/967 | 143/802 | 22 |
Su(var)2-502 | 6/800 | 140/983 | 303/1,122 | 171/791 | 108/620 | 43/273 | 62/353 | 20 |
Su(var)2-504 | 0/525 | 181/733 | 130/515 | 96/584 | 18/146 | 21 | ||
Su(var)2-505 | 0/460 | 98/820 | 128/578 | 70/459 | 61/311 | 67/720 | 14 | |
Su(var)2-5/Dp(2;2)P90 | 80/806 | 9/1,457 | 2/1,365 | 4/1,417 | 0.35c |
The scheme of crosses is shown in Fig. 2. All tested lines have genotypes yTD/yac; Su(var)2-5/CyO and yTD/yac; If/CyO.
Q, average frequency of visible events signifying a new y phenotype(s) versus total number of flies scored (as a percentage).
In the case of the Su(var)2-5/Dp(2;2)P90 combination, Q was calculated for generations F5 to F7 only.