Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Mar 15;62(7):1134–1140. doi: 10.1111/jpc.70352

Maternal Smoking, Vaping and Infant Sleep Practices in Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: A New Zealand Case Series

Edwin A Mitchell 1,✉, Stephanie Cowan 2, Barry J Taylor 3
PMCID: PMC13378276  PMID: 41834025

ABSTRACT

Background

New Zealand's sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) rates remain high, and ethnic disparities appear to be increasing. This study describes the characteristics and circumstances of these deaths.

Methods

Coronial data identified 101 SUDI cases in 2022–2023. Sociodemographic factors, sleep environment, and maternal smoking and/or vaping were analysed and compared with previous years.

Results

The SUDI rate was 0.87/1000 live births. Rates among Māori (1.97/1000) and Pacific (0.91/1000) infants were higher than those among Europeans (0.17/1000). 72.3% of cases occurred while direct bed sharing. Maternal smoking was reported in 51.5% of cases, vaping in 30.3%, and smoking and/or vaping in 72.7%. Vaping was more likely in bed‐sharing than non‐bed‐sharing deaths (p = 0.003). Compared with New Zealand studies from 1987 to 1990 and 2012 to 2015, current cases show increasing proportions of Māori and Pacific infants, older mothers, back sleeping and direct bed sharing.

Conclusions

SUDI rates remain unacceptably high with widening ethnic disparities. The proportion of deaths associated with direct bed sharing is striking and is increasing. Vaping appears to be an emerging SUDI risk factor, especially when combined with direct bed sharing. Further studies examining the association of vaping with SUDI are urgently needed.

Keywords: bed sharing, ethnicity, infant mortality, smoking, sudden unexpected death in infancy, vaping

Key Messages

  • What is already known on this topic
    • ○
      Maternal smoking in pregnancy and direct bed sharing are major risk factors for sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), especially when they occur together.
    • ○
      In New Zealand, smoking in pregnancy has decreased, but paradoxically, SUDI rates remain unchanged.
  • What this study adds
    • ○
      Vaping is an emerging SUDI risk, especially when combined with direct bed sharing and may help explain this paradox.
    • ○
      Further studies examining the association of vaping with SUDI are urgently needed.

1. Introduction

Sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) refers to the sudden death of an infant under 1 year of age, occurring during sleep. It includes sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and other deaths where a possible cause, such as accidental asphyxia, may be identified. Although ‘Back to Sleep’ campaigns advising the back sleeping position greatly reduced infant mortality, SUDI remains a major concern in New Zealand. Established modifiable risks include prone sleeping position, maternal smoking, lack of breastfeeding, and bed sharing. A strong interaction between maternal smoking and bed sharing, first shown in New Zealand [1] and confirmed elsewhere [2, 3, 4], greatly increases risk.

New Zealand has implemented various ‘safe‐sleep’ initiatives, including the targeted provision of in‐bed sleepers like Wahakura and Pēpi‐Pod, which were associated with a fall in post‐perinatal mortality [5]. However, despite these efforts, New Zealand's SUDI rates have plateaued.

This report aims to describe the characteristics and circumstances of SUDI deaths occurring in New Zealand during 2022 and 2023, drawing attention to prevailing risk factors and emerging concerns.

2. Methods

This analysis of SUDI cases occurring in 2022 and 2023 was conducted using coronial data. Cases were assigned as SUDI by expert review (E.A.M., with unclear cases reviewed by B.J.T.) if the infant death was sudden and unexpected, occurred when the infant (less than 1 year of age) was thought to be asleep, and a postmortem examination did not identify an alternative explanation for the death.

Detailed sociodemographic information was available from the Coronial Infant Death file, which included a short report on the circumstances for all (n = 101) cases. Detailed reports by the SUDI Liaison were available for 66 out of 101 cases (65.3%). SUDI Liaisons are health‐trained investigators equivalent to medical investigators in the United States who use a standardised approach and structured questions for reporting to the coroner.

Information extracted included infant sex, ethnicity, age at death, sleeping surface, bed‐sharing status, position placed to sleep, dummy (pacifier) use, maternal smoking (in pregnancy or after birth), maternal vaping (in pregnancy or after birth), father's smoking status, other household members' smoking, breastfeeding status, and the presence of an in‐bed sleeper in the house. Direct bed sharing was defined as the baby sharing the same sleep surface with another person at the time of death. Data were extracted into an Excel spreadsheet, and descriptive data were presented. Denominator data for mortality rates were obtained from Stats NZ Infoshare.

For comparison of smoking/vaping rates in the bed‐sharing group with those in the non‐bed‐sharing group, chi‐squared statistics or Fisher's exact test (when a cell was < 5) and Cramer's V were calculated. Cramer's V provides a measure of the strength of an association. Greater than 0.3–0.5 indicates a moderately strong association.

Case data from two previously reported New Zealand case–control studies were extracted and compared with the current cases. In testing for trend over time, either the Cochran–Armitage test for trend of binary outcomes was used, or for ordered multi‐category outcomes (birthweight, mother's age), the Mantel linear‐by‐linear association test was used.

Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee (17/NTA/245).

3. Results

A total of 101 SUDI cases occurred in New Zealand during 2022 and 2023, resulting in an overall SUDI mortality rate of 0.87 per 1000 live births. There were marked ethnic disparities: Māori 1.97/1000, Pacific 0.91/1000, Asian 0.07/1000 and European 0.17/1000. The majority of these deaths occurred within the first 3 months of life, with specific infant demographics and birth characteristics detailed in Tables 1 and 2.

TABLE 1.

Sociodemographic factors, pregnancy and infant care practices (n = 101).

N %
Ethnicity
Māori 69 68.3
Pacific 18 17.8
Asian 2 2.0
European 12 11.9
Sex of infant
Male 62 61.4
Female 39 38.6
Age of infant at death (completed weeks)
< 13 64 63.4
13–25 22 21.8
26–38 9 8.9
39–51 6 5.9
Season
December–February 19 18.8
March–May 23 22.8
June–August 33 32.7
September–November 26 25.7
Bed‐sharing at the time of death
Yes 73 72.3
No 28 27.7
Sleeping surface at time of death
Bed/mattress 68 67.3
Bassinet/cot 14 13.9
Portable cot/Porta cot 3 3.0
Pēpi‐Pod/wahakura 4 4.0
Sofa/recliner chair 7 6.9
Bean bag 1 1.0
Miscellaneous 4 4.0

TABLE 2.

Data from SUDI Liaison reports (n = 66).

N %
Preterm birth < 37 weeks' gestation
Yes 19 28.8
No 47 71.2
Birthweight (g)
< 2500 20 30.8
2500–2999 15 23.1
3000–3499 11 16.9
3500–3999 15 23.1
4000+ 4 6.2
UK 1
Position placed to sleep
Back 48 77.4
Side 9 14.5
Front 5 8.1
DK/unsure 4
Dummy/pacifier used last sleep
Yes 24 37.5
No 40 62.5
DK 2
Mother smoked in pregnancy
Yes 34 51.5
No 32 48.5
Mother smoked after birth
Yes 32 49.2
No 33 50.8
DK 1
Mother vaped in pregnancy
Yes 20 30.3
No 46 69.7
Mother vaped after birth
Yes 24 36.9
No 41 63.1
DK 1
Father smoked after birth
Yes 30 57.7
No 22 42.3
DK 6
NA 8
Breastfeeding ever
Yes 60 90.9
No 6 9.1
In‐bed sleeper in house
Pēpi‐Pod 15 22.7
Wahakura 14 21.2
Pēpi‐Pod and wahakura 2 3.0
Yes, type not specified 5 7.6
No 30 a 45.5
a

Eight were offered an in‐bed sleeper but declined, one was supplied with a bassinet.

A striking finding was that 72.3% of deaths occurred while the infant was directly bed sharing (Table 1). While infants were most frequently found on a standard bed or mattress, a variety of other surfaces were recorded, ranging from sofas to portable sleepers; a comprehensive breakdown of these sleep environments is provided in Table 1.

Despite long‐standing ‘Back to Sleep’ campaigns, a notable minority of infants were still being placed in non‐supine positions, though the majority were placed on their backs.

Maternal smoking and vaping were prevalent in these data, with nearly three‐quarters of all cases involving maternal smoking, vaping or both (Table 3). Vaping has emerged as a particularly frequent factor, with 40.9% of mothers reporting use during pregnancy and/or after birth. Crucially, the data reveal a significant statistical association between these habits and sleep practices: infants who died while bed sharing were much more likely to have been exposed to maternal smoking or vaping compared to those who were not bed sharing.

TABLE 3.

Association of maternal smoking and vaping with bed sharing status.

Bed sharing (n = 46) No bed sharing (n = 20) Statistical test p Cramér's V
Any smoking or vaping 39 (84.8%) 9 (45.0%) χ 2 = 11.13 < 0.001 0.41
Neither smoking nor vaping 7 (15.2%) 11 (55.0%) Reference
Any smoking 28 (60.9%) 8 (40.0%) χ 2 = 7.96 0.005 0.38
Any vaping 23 (50.0%) 4 (20.0%) Fisher's exact 0.003 0.48

Note: Data based on the 66 cases with complete SUDI Liaison reports. Percentages refer to the proportion within the bed‐sharing or non‐bed‐sharing group.

In‐bed sleepers (Pēpi‐Pod/wahakura) in the home were present for 36 (54.5%) families but were used at the time of death by only 4. A total of 30 had no in‐bed sleeper, although 8 of these were offered 1 but declined (1 was supplied with a bassinet).

There were several significant shifts in risk factors compared with historical New Zealand data from 1987 to 1990 [1, 6] and 2012 to 2015 [7] (Table 4), including a substantial increase in the proportion of Māori and Pacific cases, alongside a rising trend in maternal age and a continued increase in the frequency of bed sharing. Conversely, positive trends include a significant decrease in prone sleeping and a recent decline in maternal smoking during pregnancy. Further longitudinal comparisons regarding birthweight, breastfeeding, and sleep positions are detailed in Table 4.

TABLE 4.

Comparison of characteristics and infant care practices among SUDI cases in the NZ Cot Death Study (1987–1990), Nationwide SUDI Case–Control Study (2012–2015), and this SUDI case series (2022 and 2023).

NZ cot death study SUDI case control study SUDI case series
1 Nov 1987–31 Oct 1990 1 Mar 2012–28 Feb 2015 2022–2023
Mortality rate/1000 live births 3.53 0.76 0.87
N % N % N % Trend Test p
Ethnicity
Māori 229 48.8 63 49.6 69 68.3 ↑ Z = 3.159 0.002
Pacific 30 6.4 19 15 18 17.8 ↑ Z = 4.091 < 0.001
Other 210 44.8 45 35.4 14 13.9 ↓ Z = −5.720 < 0.001
Sex of infant
Male 284 61.1 77 57.9 62 61.4 ↔ Z = −0.182 0.856
Female 181 38.9 56 42.1 39 38.6
Birthweight (g)
< 2500 82 17.6 15 12.6 20 30.8 ↔ χ 2 = 1.378 0.240
2500–2999 111 23.9 29 24.4 15 23.1
3000–3499 135 29.0 42 35.3 11 16.9
3500+ 137 29.5 33 27.7 19 29.2
Mother's age
< 20 87 18.7 26 21.1 8 12.1
20–24 157 33.8 45 36.6 17 25.8
25–29 139 29.9 27 22.0 16 24.2
30+ 82 17.6 25 20.3 25 37.9 ↑ χ 2 = 1.378 0.019
Mother smoked while pregnant
Yes 285 64.8 92 74.2 34 51.5 ↔ Z = −0.873 0.382
No 155 35.2 32 25.8 32 48.5
Breastfeeding ever
Yes 342 87.2 115 89.8 60 90.9 ↔ Z = 1.047 0.295
No 50 12.8 13 10.2 6 9.1
Position placed to sleep
Back 18 4.7 83 65.9 48 77.4 ↑ Z = 16.023 < 0.001
Side 120 30.9 31 24.6 9 14.5
Front 250 64.4 12 9.5 5 8.1
Bed‐sharing
Yes 94 24.0 73 57.5 73 72.3 ↑ Z = 9.945 < 0.001
No 297 76.0 54 42.5 28 27.7

4. Discussion

Analysis of SUDI deaths in New Zealand during 2022 and 2023 shows a persistently high rate (0.87/1000 live births), well above Australia (0.32/1000 live births in 2023) and Northern Europe (0.1/1000) [8]. Despite decreases in NZ of infant prone sleeping and maternal smoking in pregnancy, SUDI mortality has not declined in the last decade. This suggests that new or increasing risk factors are contributing, or existing ones are becoming more prevalent and/or impactful.

Persistent and widening ethnic disparities are evident, with Māori infants accounting for 68.3% of deaths. This aligns with earlier reports that Māori infants are disproportionately exposed to recognised SUDI risks—especially smoking and direct bed sharing—as well as socio‐economic and demographic factors. Although the risk associated with smoking and bed sharing is similar across ethnicities, their higher prevalence among Māori results in a greater SUDI burden [9].

The most striking finding is the high proportion of deaths (72.3%) occurring during direct bed sharing—a marked increase from 24.0% in 1987–1990 and 57.5% in 2012–2015. This proportion exceeds UK studies (32% and 36%) [4, 10] and the United States (59.5%) [11]. Evidence suggests that bed sharing increases the risk of SUDI, even without smoking or other hazards, for infants under 3 months, albeit by a small amount [2]. Risk is greatly amplified when combined with smoking. Add maternal alcohol consumption and/or drug use [1, 4, 10, 12], and the risk escalates to alarming levels. Current population data for bed‐sharing prevalence are limited, but records for the same period from Whānau Āwhina Plunket (the major provider of well‐child services) show 18.4% of parents reported bed sharing at 6 weeks [13], far below the 72.3% in this series. This implicates bed sharing as a major contributor to the plateau in SUDI rates. A previous meta‐analysis estimated that about 88% of deaths during bed sharing were attributable to it, assuming causality [2].

Encouragingly, several trends are positive. Fewer deaths now occur among young mothers, and prone or side sleeping has declined, reflecting successful safe‐sleep campaigns. Breastfeeding rates among cases remain high, a recognised protective factor against SIDS. Also, maternal smoking at 2 weeks postnatal has fallen markedly from 13.7% in 2009 to 7.3% in 2021 [14].

The paradox of stable SUDI rates despite positive changes suggests new challenges. Maternal smoking and vaping clustered strongly with bed sharing. The use of Cramer's V highlights a substantial overall association without implying causality. These findings should be interpreted strictly as within‐case associations, reflecting exposure co‐occurrence among SUDI cases rather than estimates of population risk. Nonetheless, the consistency and strength of the observed associations support the hypothesis that smoking and vaping are markers of unsafe‐sleep contexts, including bed sharing and reinforce public health messages advising against bed sharing in the presence of any nicotine exposure.

Vaping is widely promoted as a harm reduction for those who smoke, including in pregnancy. A 2015 review reported it was ‘95% less harmful than cigarettes’ [15], but pregnancy was not addressed. Public education endorsed by the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) in 2019 stated that nicotine alone is relatively harmless and reiterated this in 2022 [16]. Yet nicotine crosses the placenta, reduces foetal blood flow and lowers birthweight [17]. We suspect that vaping may also produce the same infant ‘arousal defect’ seen with tobacco exposure [18]. Public‐health messaging should urgently reflect these risks.

A parallel exists with snus (and snuff), a smokeless tobacco high in nicotine and other chemicals, absorbed through the oral mucosa. Cohort studies in Sweden and Norway link snus to reduced birthweight, increased preterm births, stillbirth, post‐neonatal and SUDI mortality and reduced infant lung function [19, 20, 21]. The risks were equivalent to moderate smoking. Awareness of the dangers of snus is high in Scandinavia, and most pregnant users stop before their first antenatal check [22]. In Sweden, the emphasis of public health education has shifted from tobacco smoking to nicotine in all its forms, including vaping [23, 24].

In 2023–2024, 11.1% of New Zealand adults reported daily vaping, with higher prevalence among Māori (28.8%), Pacific peoples (21.5%) and adults aged 18–24 years (26.5%) [25]. By contrast, in Australia, daily vaping was 6.7% among those aged 18–44 and 1.6% among people aged 45 years and older [26]. Australia's lower rates may reflect stricter regulation, including a 2021 prescription requirement for nicotine e‐cigarettes and, from 2024, limiting sales to pharmacies for smoking cessation only [27]. In New Zealand, several measures from the 2022 Smokefree Action Plan—such as the planned reduction in retail outlets, a very low‐nicotine product standard and the proposed ‘smokefree generation’ policy—were recently repealed, potentially slowing progress towards reducing tobacco‐related harm. Current vaping regulation remains comparatively narrow, focusing mainly on penalties for sales to minors and the proximity of specialist vaping stores to early childhood education centres.

As shown in Table 2, 54% of cases had an in‐bed sleeper in the home at the time of death, higher than supply rates reported for 2019–2021 [22]. As most infants older than 13 weeks will have outgrown in‐bed sleepers, a focused look at those under 13 weeks shows that 42 of 64 (65.6%) infants had no in‐bed sleepers; of the 22 (34.4%) with 1, only 3 (13.6%) were being used at the time of death. Previous work shows distribution is often inappropriate, with many low‐risk infants receiving in‐bed sleepers while high‐risk infants miss out [28]. Further research should explore how these devices are used in practice and barriers to their use when bed sharing with younger infants.

Findings from this case series highlight the urgent need to strengthen SUDI prevention messages about bed sharing. Current advice, that it is dangerous only when additional hazards are present, is no longer adequate. Guidance should distinguish intrinsic infant risk from environmental hazards and direct from indirectly bed sharing. A firmer stance is needed against direct bed sharing for vulnerable infants: those under 3 months who were exposed to smoking and/or vaping in pregnancy. For these babies, an in‐bed sleeper should be used every time bed sharing occurs. If all mothers who smoked or vaped used in‐bed sleepers instead of direct bed sharing, about 45% of SUDI deaths in this series might have been prevented, assuming sleepers offer protection comparable with separate sleep surfaces. Hazards without smoking/vaping—such as sofas, bean bags, alcohol and drugs—remain risks, but in our population account for a small proportion of deaths.

A limitation of this analysis is that it is a small case series, meaning it lacks control data for factors like vaping in pregnancy and bed sharing, preventing the calculation of odds ratios. Reliance on coronial records also meant some variables were incomplete (only 66% or 65% of the cases had full data on smoking and vaping). Nonetheless, the consistency with earlier findings supports the validity of these data [29]. We believe all 2022–2023 SUDI cases were captured, although final coroners' rulings may differ from our assessment.

5. Conclusion

This case series reveals that the overall mortality rate for SUDI in NZ remains unacceptably high, with increasing ethnic disparities. The most significant finding is the remarkably high proportion of deaths (72.3%) occurring while direct bed sharing, with the large majority of these (84.8%) reporting smoking and/or vaping. This combination appears to be a major driver of current SUDI rates. While prone sleeping and maternal smoking have declined among cases, vaping has emerged as a potential new or replacement risk factor requiring urgent attention. This finding highlights the urgent need for further studies examining the association of vaping with SUDI and bed sharing.

Funding

The authors have nothing to report.

Ethics Statement

Ethics approval for this study was granted by the NZ Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee (17/NTA/245).

Conflicts of Interest

Stephanie Cowan is Director of Change for our Children, which owns the intellectual property of the Pēpi‐Pod Program and supplies it on a cost‐recovery basis; she receives a salary from this social business. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Chief Coroner for access to the coronial data. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Ministry of Justice. We also thank the SUDI Liaison staff, Erica Benge and Elaine McLardy, for their sensitive collection of the data from bereaved families. Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Auckland, as part of the Wiley ‐ The University of Auckland agreement via the Council of Australasian University Librarians.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Coronial Services, Ministry of Justice, New Zealand. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of Coronial Services, Ministry of Justice, New Zealand.

References

  • 1. Scragg R., Mitchell E. A., Taylor B. J., et al., “Bed Sharing, Smoking, and Alcohol in the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. New Zealand Cot Death Study Group,” BMJ 307, no. 6915 (1993): 1312–1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Carpenter R., McGarvey C., Mitchell E. A., et al., “Bed Sharing When Parents Do Not Smoke: Is There a Risk of SIDS? An Individual Level Analysis of Five Major Case–Control Studies,” BMJ Open 3, no. 5 (2013): e002299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Vennemann M. M., Hense H.‐W., Bajanowski T., et al., “Bed Sharing and the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Can We Resolve the Debate?,” Journal of Pediatrics 160, no. 1 (2012): 44–48.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Blair P. S., Sidebotham P., Pease A., and Fleming P. J., “Bed‐Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis From Two Case‐Control Studies Conducted in the UK,” PLoS One 9, no. 9 (2014): e107799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mitchell E. A., Cowan S., and Tipene‐Leach D., “The Recent Fall in Postperinatal Mortality in New Zealand and the Safe Sleep Programme,” Acta Paediatrica 105, no. 11 (2016): 1312–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mitchell E. A., Taylor B. J., Ford R. P., et al., “Four Modifiable and Other Major Risk Factors for Cot Death: The New Zealand Study,” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 28, no. S1 (1992): S3–S8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mitchell E. A., Thompson J. M., Zuccollo J., et al., “The Combination of Bed Sharing and Maternal Smoking Leads to a Greatly Increased Risk of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: The New Zealand SUDI Nationwide Case Control Study,” New Zealand Medical Journal 130, no. 1456 (2017): 52–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Manfredini M., Perrone S., Ardenghi A., et al., “The Changing Epidemiology of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: A 15‐Year Overview Comparing Italian and European Data,” Health Science Reports 8, no. 3 (2025): e70599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mitchell E. A. and Scragg R., “Observations on Ethnic Differences in SIDS Mortality in New Zealand,” Early Human Development 38, no. 3 (1994): 151–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Blair P. S., Fleming P. J., Smith I. J., et al., “Babies Sleeping With Parents: Case‐Control Study of Factors Influencing the Risk of the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome CESDI SUDI Research Group,” BMJ 319, no. 7223 (1999): 1457–1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Erck Lambert A. B., Shapiro‐Mendoza C. K., Parks S. E., Cottengim C., Faulkner M., and Hauck F. R., “Characteristics of Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths on Shared and Nonshared Sleep Surfaces,” Pediatrics 153, no. 3 (2024): e2023061984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. MacFarlane M. E., Thompson J. M. D., Wilson J., et al., “Infant Sleep Hazards and the Risk of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy,” Journal of Pediatrics 245 (2022): 56–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Daniels L., Taylor B. J., Haszard J. J., et al., “Early Infant Sleep Environments: An Observational Study of New Zealand Electronic Health Data,” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 62, no. 2 (2026): 171–180, 10.1111/jpc.70245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Environmental Health Intelligence New Zealand , Maternal Smoking at Two Weeks Postnatal , Surveillance Report (Massey University, 2024), https://www.ehinz.ac.nz/assets/Factsheets/Released_2024/Maternal‐Smoking‐2021‐data‐14.03.2024.pdf.
  • 15. McNeill A., Brose L. S., Calder R., Hitchman S. C., Hajek P., and McRobbie H., E‐Cigarettes: An Evidence Update. A Report Commissioned by Public Health England (Public Health England, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Royal College of Midwives , Position Statement: Support to Quit Smoking in Pregnancy (Royal College of Midwives, 2022).
  • 17. Deprato A., Garud A., Azzolina D., et al., “Associations Between Vaping During Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 486 (2025): 137028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hafström O., Milerad J., Sandberg K. L., and Sundell H. W., “Cardiorespiratory Effects of Nicotine Exposure During Development,” Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 149, no. 1–3 (2005): 325–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gunnerbeck A., Lundholm C., Rhedin S., et al., “Association of Maternal Snuff Use and Smoking With Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: A National Register Study,” Pediatric Research 94, no. 2 (2023): 811–819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lie R. T., Magnus M. C., Gjessing H. K., Wilcox A. J., and Håberg S. E., “Daily Snuff Use During Pregnancy, Gestational Length and Birth Weight; Register‐Based Study,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 24, no. 1 (2024): 646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bains K. E. S., Kreyberg I., Fardig M., et al., “Maternal Use of Snus as Smokeless Tobacco in Pregnancy and Infant Lung Function,” ERJ Open Research 10, no. 4 (2024): 00958‐2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kreyberg I., Bains K. E. S., Carlsen K. H., et al., “Stopping When Knowing: Use of Snus and Nicotine During Pregnancy in Scandinavia,” ERJ Open Research 5, no. 2 (2019): 00197‐02018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. National Board of Health and Welfare [Socialstyrelsen] , “Reducing the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome,” https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer/minska‐risken‐for‐plotslig‐spadbarnsdod‐‐sex‐rad‐till‐dig‐som‐foralder‐‐engelska‐2014‐9‐3/.
  • 24. Wennergren G., “Review of How the Advice to Reduce Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Was Developed, Including Its Dramatic Impact on Sweden,” Acta Paediatrica 115 (2025): 554–562, 10.1111/apa.70397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nip J., Edwards R., Hoek J., Waa A., Ball J., and Pettie M., “Vaping Prevalence and Trends: Important Findings From 2023–24 NZ Health Survey,” 2024, https://www.phcc.org.nz/briefing/vaping‐prevalence‐and‐trends‐important‐findings‐2023‐24‐nz‐health‐survey.
  • 26. Australian Bureau of Statistics , Smoking and Vaping (ABS, 2022), https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health‐conditions‐and‐risks/smoking‐and‐vaping/latest‐release.
  • 27. Jenkins C., Morgan J., and Kelso C., “A Short History of E‐Cigarette Policy in Australia,” Perspectives in Public Health 145, no. 2 (2025): 57–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mitchell E. A., Cowan S., Wilson J., and Thompson J., “Who Is Supplied With In‐Bed Sleepers (Pepi‐Pod and Wahakura) for Reducing SUDI in New Zealand?,” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 61 (2025): 1444–1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Taylor B. and Faoesi A., Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: An Analysis of Coronial SUDI Liaison Reports From Sept 2018 to June 2020 With Subsequent Recommendations (Ministry of Health, 2022). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Coronial Services, Ministry of Justice, New Zealand. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of Coronial Services, Ministry of Justice, New Zealand.


Articles from Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES