Skip to main content
. 2002 Jun;22(12):4147–4157. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.12.4147-4157.2002

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Sim2 has no obvious genetic interaction with Sim1 in PVN development and energy homeostasis. Brains of wild-type (Sim1+/+/Sim2+/+) (A), Sim2 mutant (Sim1+/+/Sim2−/−) (B), Sim1 heterozygous (Sim1+/−/Sim2+/+) (C), Sim1 heterozygote/Sim2 mutant (Sim1+/−/Sim2−/−) (D), and Sim1 mutant (Sim1−/−) (E) mice were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin. SCN, suprachiasmatic nucleus. An asterisk labels the medial preoptic nucleus as a reference. Dashed lines outline the ventral boundary of the PVN. Arrowheads in panel E indicate the lack of PVN and SON in Sim1−/− mice. (F and G) 35S radioactive in situ hybridization of the PVN/SON region with Sim1 and Sim2 probes. (H) Six females (left) and five males (right) of each of the following genotypes were used in this study: wild type (wt, triangles), Sim1+/− (diamonds), Sim2+/− (circles), and Sim1+/−/Sim2+/− (squares). Animals were weighed every 4 weeks after birth, continuing on until 30 weeks. The average weight (in grams) was plotted, and the error bars represent standard errors. By Student's t test, there is no significant difference between wild-type and Sim2 heterozygous mice (P > 0.75) or between Sim1+/− and Sim2+/−/Sim1+/− mice (P > 0.8).