Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 22;16(37):39007–39045. doi: 10.1039/d6ra00667a

Table 4. Summary of adsorption performance of various adsorbents for the removal of mycotoxins from different matrices, including removal efficiency, isotherm and kinetic models, maximum adsorption capacity (qmax), contact time, and reusabilitya.

Adsorbate Matrix Removal efficiency (%) Isotherms/kinetics Model fitting method R 2 (isotherm model) Reusability q max (mg g−1) Contact time (min) Ref.
Bentonite/humic acid/beta-glucan-mannan composite (70 : 10 : 20) Simulated gastrointestinal fluid 98.07% Pseudo-second-order (chemisorption) Linear Not specified Not specified 0.332 360 45
LS-Fe3O4@UiO-66 Aqueous solution of AFB1 ∼90% Freundlich/pseudo-second-order Linear 0.976 Excellent; >80% efficiency after 3 cycles Not specified for the composite (focus was on overall removal) 180 47
MGO (magnetic graphene oxide) Contaminated oils (rice, bran oil) 98.41% Freundlich/pseudo-second-order Linear 0.9910 Excellent 1.68 60 79
Stearyl trimethyl ammonium bromide modified nano-montmorillonite (NMMT-STAB) Dairy cow rumen fluid Not specified Freundlich/pseudo-second-order Linear 0.95 Not specified 9.23 15 80
C-Cu-BTC MOF-600 Vegetable oils (peanut, corn) >90% Langmuir/pseudo-second-order Non-linear — Not specified 16.92 30 94
OP-bentonite (orange peel extract modified bentonite) Buffered solutions and simulated gastrointestinal fluids ∼95% Langmuir/pseudo-second-order Linear 0.992 Not specified 166.00 120 107
Metformin-chitosan/silica-cobalt ferrite nanospheres (Mt-CS/CFS NSs) Aqueous solution & cow's milk >91% Freundlich/pseudo-second-order Linear 0.993 Excellent (∼88% efficiency after 7 cycles) 3.89 80 112
Fe/N-PC (derived from Fe-doped ZIF-8) Aqueous solution of AFB1 (also tested in tofu wastewater) 99.88% Langmuir/pseudo-second-order (adsorption); PMS-activated catalytic oxidation Linear 0.999 Good; >75% efficiency after 3 cycles 202.80 30 157
Walnut shell nano-biosorbent (WSN) Aqueous solution of AFB1 93.7% Langmuir/pseudo-second-order Linear 0.9950 Excellent; <5% drop in removal after 5 cycles 176.30 45 158
Sodium alginate incorporated attapulgite (SA-ATP) Aromatic peanut oil 98.37% Langmuir/pseudo-second-order Linear 0.9925 Not specified 0.0406 60 159
Sugarcane bagasse fly ash (BFA) Simulated gastrointestinal fluid (buffer solutions) ∼91% Langmuir/pseudo-second-order Non-linear — Not specified 115.00 120 160
Chitosan/palygorskite (C-A1) Simulated gastrointestinal fluid (PBS buffer) ∼95.5% Linear isotherm model/pseudo-second-order Linear 0.982 Stable with minimal desorption 1.89 20 161
HKR-90 (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide modified kaolinite) Phosphate buffer solution conditions ∼97% Langmuir/Freundlich/sips Non-linear — Not specified 8.90 30 162
a

All adsorption capacities are reported in mg g−1, and concentrations are expressed in mg L−1. Where necessary, units have been converted for consistency. ‘—’ indicates data not reported in the original study or R2 values omitted for non-linear entries to ensure comparability. Parameter estimation in the majority of cited literature is based on linear transformations; however, modern standards advocate for nonlinear fitting due to its higher reliability. As a comprehensive review, our primary goal is to compile and present the existing body of data as originally reported in the literature. To maintain data integrity while avoiding the mathematical inconsistency of comparing coefficients with different Y-axes, R2 values are listed only for linear isotherm studies. All cross-methodological evaluations of adsorbent performance are strictly based on absolute adsorption capacities. Values represent reported means; standard deviations (±) are omitted to maintain table uniformity across the vast range of cited literature where such data was largely unavailable.