Table 2.
meta-inferred joint display of qualitative and quantitative data
| Meta-inference (integrated finding) | Supporting quantitative evidence | Supporting qualitative evidence | Implications for intervention |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. High vaccine willingness exists alongside major access barriers, creating a critical implementation gap. | Overall vaccine willingness: 98.1%. Willingness among parents of zero-dose children: 89.7%. | Dominant themes of stockouts ("if the mami them cam then vaccine no be available"), long distances, transportation costs, and insecurity ("Amba di always parade those areas"). | Shift focus from demand creation to reliable service delivery. Prioritize mobile clinics, supply chain resilience, and flexible scheduling to overcome physical and security barriers. |
| 2. Low parental confidence (self-efficacy) is a key risk factor, driven by logistical obstacles, not just attitude. | Lower self-efficacy/confidence significantly associated with zero-dose status (aOR=0.50 for high confidence). | Parents expressed feeling unable to vaccinate due to unpredictable vaccine availability, cost of travel, and clinic closures, undermining their perceived ability to act. | Boost self-efficacy by making vaccination predictable and easy. Implement community-based delivery, fixed advance schedules, and remove point-of-care costs. |
| 3. Misinformation undermines the perceived benefit and value of vaccination. | Disagreement that "vaccines are a major advancement for humanity" strongly associated with zero-dose status (aOR=2.35). | Prevalent narratives of vaccines as tools for "population control," "infertility," or being "fake" (e.g., "government want eliminate male children"). | Counter misinformation by co-opting trusted community channels. Engage chiefs, pastors, and local health workers as credible messengers for benefit-focused education. |
| 4. Community leaders are pivotal, trusted facilitators for health decisions. | Not a direct quantitative measure, but aligns with high willingness influenced by external cues. | Consistent identification of chiefs, quarter heads, and religious leaders as the most influential figures for mobilizing compliance and building trust. | Formally integrate and train community leaders as vaccine advocates. Empower them to lead mobilization, disseminate correct information, and legitimize outreach efforts. |
| 5. Perceived severity of diseases is a weaker motivator compared to tangible access and benefit perceptions. | Perceived low disease seriousness was only marginally associated with zero-dose status (p=0.079). | While disease severity was acknowledged, discussions focused overwhelmingly on immediate practical barriers and fears about vaccine safety/intent. | Emphasize practical benefits and safety in messaging. Move beyond fear-based communication about diseases to highlight vaccination as a feasible, positive community norm. |