Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 13;13:1878848. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1878848

Table 2.

Quality assessment results.

References 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total score
Yamaguchi et al. (26) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 8
Tani et al. (7) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 8
Pinheiro et al. (27) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 8
Kimura et al. (28) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 8
Björnwall et al. (16) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 9
Kwon et al. (30) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 9
Minagawa-Watanabe et al. (31) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 8
Ishikawa et al. (32) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 8
Yokoro et al. (33) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 8
Ishida and Ishida (34) 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 7
Locher et al. (35) 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 5
Prothro et al. (37) 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 7
Takiguchi et al. (36) 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 8
Son et al. (38) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 9
Kuroda et al. (40) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 8
Kang et al. (39) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 7
Kantilafti et al. (41) 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 8
Wang et al. (42) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 9
Kushida et al. (43) 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 8
Sakurai et al. (9) 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 8
Moon et al. (21) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 9