Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 28;18(7):e113498. doi: 10.7759/cureus.113498

Table 1. Distinguishing features of FAP-associated CHRPE, sporadic solitary CHRPE, and CGP.

Comparative morphologic, imaging, and histopathologic features of FAP-associated CHRPE, sporadic solitary CHRPE, and CGP (bear tracks). Asterisks (*) mark the five features most strongly supported by the evidence as distinguishing FAP-associated CHRPE from sporadic CHRPE and CGP: number, laterality, lacunae, cystoid edema, and PED. FAP-associated imaging data are derived principally from a single multimodal-imaging series [28]; cystoid edema and PED figures are based on small lesion counts and warrant cautious interpretation.

CGP, congenital grouped pigmentation; CHRPE, congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; FAP, familial adenomatous polyposis; OCT, optical coherence tomography; ONL, outer nuclear layer; PED, pigment epithelial detachment.

Feature  FAP-associated CHRPE  Sporadic solitary CHRPE  Bear tracks (CGP) 
* Number  Multiple (~10/eye)  Solitary  Multiple (3-30) 
* Laterality  Bilateral 77-100%  Unilateral  Unilateral, sectorial 
* Lacunae  Absent  Present 43-78%  Absent 
* Cystoid edema  Absent  Present 28%  Not reported 
* PED  Present 22.4%  Not reported  Not reported 
Size  Small dots  Larger, 4.5 mm  Smaller near disc 
Shape  Round / pisciform  Round / oval  Falciform, nested 
Location  Outside posterior pole  Peripheral  Sectorial from disc 
Halo  Fish-tail ~49%  Pigmented 78%  Not typical 
OCT outer retina  ONL thinning  ONL thinning  Normal lamination 
FAF (pigmented)  Hypo 93%  Hypo 100%  Hypo 
Pigment granule  Macromelanosome  Macromelanosome  Normal ellipsoidal 
FAP association  76-80% of FAP  None  None