Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 15;17:1874193. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1874193

Table 3.

Summarizes the evaluations of beta diversity in the included research.

Study β diversity Findings Statistic value
Huang (2024) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p < 0.01
PCoA based on the Unweighted UniFrac distances A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p < 0.01
PCoA based on the Weighted Unifrac distance A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p < 0.01
Yang (2022) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.005
Zhao et al. (2025) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.002
Yao et al. (2025) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.001
Sun et al. (2023) PCoA based on the Unweighted UniFrac distances A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p < 0.001
Manzoor et al. (2025) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.003
PCoA analysis based on Jaccard distance A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.007
He et al. (2024) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.003
Manzoor et al. (2024) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity No difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.325
PCoA based on Jaccard distance No difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.850
PCoA based on the Weighted Unifrac distance No difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.403
Zheng et al. (2026) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity A significant difference in oral microbial composition among S and H p = 0.001