Table 2.
Predictive Performance of Handcrafted Clinical Feature Combinations for Predicting pCR.
| Case | Selected features | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Balanced ACC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Positive nodes number, Weight, cN stage | 0.74±0.11 | 0.500 ± 0.279 | 0.835 ± 0.032 | 0.667 ± 0.130 |
| 2 | Positive nodes number, weight | 0.72±0.09 | 0.400 ± 0.226 | 0.798 ± 0.051 | 0.599 ± 0.089 |
| 3 | Positive nodes number, distance to anorectal junction | 0.62±0.06 | 0.567 ± 0.082 | 0.676 ± 0.054 | 0.621 ± 0.030 |
| 4 | Positive nodes number, Number nodes | 0.65±0.08 | 0.533 ± 0.245 | 0.634 ± 0.103 | 0.583 ± 0.114 |
| 5 | Positive nodes number, cT | 0.65±0.05 | 0.833 ± 0.149 | 0.474 ± 0.104 | 0.653 ± 0.057 |
| 6 | cN stage | 0.63±0.11 | 0.800 ± 0.194 | 0.549 ± 0.109 | 0.674 ± 0.096 |
Combination 1: Positive nodes number with weight and cN stage; Combination 2: Positive nodes number with weight; Combination 3: Positive nodes number with distance to anorectal junction; Combination 4: Positive nodes number number nodes; Combination 5; Positive nodes number with cT; Combination 6: Positive nodes number with cT, and cN stage. Performance metrics are reported as mean ± standard deviation across cross - validated XGBoost models.