Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 24;168(1):201. doi: 10.1007/s00701-026-06967-4

Table 2.

Study characteristics

Author, year Country/Center Study Design N (Total Patients) Mean/Median Age % Female Symptom Duration (months) Tumor Size/Volume Knosp/Hardy/Fujimoto Grade Pre-op VF Assessment Method Follow-up Duration
Elshazly et al., 2018 [17] USA – Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Retrospective chart review 55 Mean 55.5 (22–88) 36% Not reported Mean diameter 5.1 cm; SSE 96% Knosp 1–4 (69% invasion) Humphrey VF testing Mean 41 months (9–95)
Fernandes et al., 2021 [19] Portugal – Hospital de Egas Moniz, Lisbon Retrospective observational cross-sectional 18 Mean 57.4 ± 16.5 44.4% Mean 12.8 ± 14.4 Mean 33.1 ± 9.2 mm Not reported Octopus VF; LogMAR VA; OCT RNFL Not specified
Izz-alarab et al., 2024 [28] Egypt – Ain Shams University, Nasser Institute Retrospective cohort 42 Mean 43.6 (22–66) 45.2% Not specified 27 large, 15 giant Knosp: 29/42 invaded; 9 grade 4 Humphrey + Snellen Mean 12.3 months (6–23)
Koutourousiou et al., 2013[36] USA – University of Pittsburgh Retrospective review 54 Mean 52.9 (18–80) 15% Not reported Mean 50 mm, 32.9 cm3 51/54 invasion; Grades 0–4 Ophthalmologic exam Mean 37.9 months
Gondim et al., 2014  [24] Brazil – Fortaleza, Campinas, Belo Horizonte Retrospective review 50 Mean 48.2 (18–78) 34% Not reported Mean 5.4 cm Knosp 2–4 in 16 pts Ophthalmologic exam Mean 5 yrs (0.3–13)
Ceylan et al., 2022 [22] Turkey – Kocaeli University Retrospective review 205 Mean 46.95 (16–80) 30.2% Not reported Mean 46.6 mm (40–87) 87 grade 1–2, 118 grade 3–4 Humphrey VF + Snellen Mean 50 months (9–247)
Zhang et al., 2023 [52] China – West China Hospital Retrospective prognostic imaging study 130 Mean 49.2 ± 13.3 57% Not reported Mean 24 mm Not reported Octopus/Humphrey automated 12 months
Han et al., 2024 [25] Pusan National Univ. Yangsan Hospital, Korea Retrospective 35 Mean 58.3 ± 11.5 60%  ~ 4 26 mm; volume predictor NR Humphrey analyzer 6 months
Juraschka et al., 2014 [30] Toronto Western Hospital, Canada Retrospective 73 Mean 54.5 ± 14.8 32% NR Diameter 4.1 cm; volume 18.4 cm3 Knosp 0–4 reported Automated perimetry 3–14 months
Chabot et al., 2015 [12] Hofstra–North Shore LIJ, Geisinger, USA Retrospective 39 Mean 56.3 ± 15.6 36% 7 3.4 cm (range 3–6.5) 0–4 reported Formal perimetry 12 months
Aiyer & Upreti, 2020 [2] Baroda Medical College & GMC Silvassa, India Prospective 14 Mean 43.6 (range 19–73) 64% NR 15–44 mm; mean 28.5 mm NR Perimetry Up to 2 years
Konan et al., 2021 [34] Yopougon & Bouaké, Côte d’Ivoire Retrospective 50 46.6 ± 1.7 (range 16–65) 36% NR 74% macroadenomas; 20% apoplexy Knosp 0–2: 60%; 3–4: 40% Computerized campimetry 6 months
Thakur et al., 2021 [47] USA – Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Saint John’s Cancer Institute (Santa Monica, CA) Retrospective cohort (prospectively maintained DB, 2010–2020) 514 Mean 51 ± 16 yrs 52.3% NR 78% macroadenomas; 18 giant; size categories (< 20, 20–29, ≥ 30 mm) Cavernous sinus invasion (incl. Knosp 4): 121 cases Formal perimetry/VA in chiasmal compression Mean 27.4 ± 26.6 mo (min 3)
Mooney et al., 2019 [20] [40] USA – Multicenter (BNI, PNI, UPMC, OSU, WashU, Northwestern) Prospective multicenter observational (subset with perimetry) 30 (with both pre/post perimetry) Mean 62.2 yrs (median 63.5) 33% NR Mean max diameter 27.1 mm (9.6–51.9) Knosp 0–2: 70%; 3–4: 30%. Hardy sellar IV: 37% Humphrey 30–2 (58%), 24–2 (37%) Mean 2.4 mo (VF); pre → post interval mean 4.3 mo
Ng et al., 2022  [42] Hong Kong – Queen Elizabeth Hospital Retrospective single-center (2015–2018) 108 Mean 59.1 ± 12.9 yrs 40% NR Absolute & supracarotid height correlated with VIS Knosp used; downgrading correlated with VA/VF gains Standard ophthalmologic perimetry; VIS scale used NR
Kemchoknatee et al., 2024 [32] Thailand – Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok Retrospective cohort (2016–2020) 87 (174 eyes) Mean 50 ± 12.8 yrs 64.4% Median 6 (IQR 1–60); improved 3 vs non-improved 12 (p < 0.001) 79.3% macroadenomas; volume assessed Hardy A–E; Knosp 0–3 (not predictive) Humphrey 30–2; reliability < 20% fixation/false responses Mean 47.5 ± 28.5 mo
van Essen et al., 2021[49] Netherlands – University Medical Center Utrecht Retrospective cohort (2010–2015) 100 Mean 53.5 ± 15.7 yrs 38% Time from ophthalmology → surgery: median 73 days Macro 89%; mean max diameter 2.6 cm; mean SSE 1.15 cm Knosp 0–4; Fujimoto 0–4 (39.8% grade 4) Humphrey/Octopus/Goldmann; ophthalmologist review Median 52 days (IQR 43–134)
Luomaranta et al., 2017 [39] Finland – Oulu University Hospital Retrospective cohort 47 54.7 yrs (18.9–80.1) 55.3% Not reported Mean 13.8 mL (VFD) vs 6.2 mL (no VFD); SSE 16.6 vs 6.6 mm Hardy A 38.3%, B 38.3%, C 14.9%, 0 8.5% Goldmann 74.5%, Humphrey 6.4%, Both 14.9%, Octopus 2.1% Not specified
Gondim et al., 2015 [23] Brazil – General Hospital of Fortaleza Retrospective cohort 55 72.5 ± 1.9 yrs 54.5% Not reported Mean 33 mm; 32.7% cystic Knosp 2: 5.4%, 3: 9%, 4: 14.5% Ophthalmologic evaluation 50 months (mean)
Fredes et al., 2017 [20] Chile – Univ. de Concepción & Brazil (Curitiba) Cross-sectional (retrospective review) 35 50.2 yrs (26–75) 51.5% Not reported All macroadenomas; 80% SSE Hardy-Wilson II 83.8%, III 8.1%, IV 8.1% Goldmann (all) Not specified
Castle-Kirszbaum 2022 [9] Australia – Monash, St. Vincent’s, Royal Melbourne Prospective cohort 304 53.8 ± 16 yrs 53% Not reported Median volume 6.28 mL (with VFD) Knosp 0–4; Hardy 0–4, A–E Humphrey (all) 3 months (acute)
Anik et al., 2018 [5] Turkey – Kocaeli Univ. & Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Hospital Prospective cohort 200 46.7 ± 11.6 yrs (18–83) 52% 5.4 months Mean 8,871 mm3 Not reported Humphrey 30–2 3 years (serial)
Aldengawy et al., 2021[3] Egypt – Al-Azhar Univ. Hospital Prospective case series 15 40.7 yrs (16–57) 40% Not reported All ≥ 4 cm (giant) Hardy A–E distribution Goldmann/confrontation 1 year
Thotakura et al., 2017 [48] India – Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences Prospective series 100 42.5 yrs (14–74) 48% 11.8 months; < 1 yr predicted better Mean 32.97 mm; SSE 14.95 mm Parasellar ext. 27 pts (Knosp 1–4) VIS (acuity + field); Goldman/clinical 43.5 months
Ji et al., 2023 [29] China – The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Retrospective, single-center 28 45.1 ± 14.7 years 64.3% Median 2.5 (IQR 0–12) Median diameter 20 mm (IQR 15–29.25) Not reported Octopus 900 static perimetry (G-TOP)  ≤ 15 months
Zhang et al., 2023 [53] China – West China Hospital, Sichuan Univ + multicenter validation Prospective cohort + external validation 220  ~ 47 years (46 vs 50 recovery/non) 53.2% Median 1.0 (IQR 2.0–2.5) Max diameter ~ 24–26 mm; SSE 15–17 mm Not specified Humphrey Field Analyzer 6 months
Chibbaro et al., 2021 [13] France, Italy, UK – 5 centers Prospective multicenter cohort 96 52.2 years (26–81) 42.7% Not specified Mean CC diameter 46.5 mm Knosp 0–4 distribution Ophthalmological exam + OCT 52.4 months (24–88)
Choo et al., 2022 [14] Republic of Korea – Yeungnam University Hospital Retrospective cohort (20 years) 181 54 (21–79) 47.0% Not specified 84.5% macro, 12.7% giant, 2.8% micro Hardy 0–4; Knosp 0–4 Automated perimetry Median 58 mo (6–255)
Kong et al., 2024 [35] China – First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Retrospective comparative cohort 58 50.8 ± 12.7 72.4% Not reported 24.5 mm Hardy used; Knosp < 3 Ophthalmologic perimetry 3 months