TABLE 4.
Comparison of skin texture improvement assessment results between two groups.
| Indicator | Group | 1 Month post-treatment | 3 Months post-treatment | 6 Months post-treatment | 12 Months post-treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin roughness index improvement rate (%) | Study group | 15.2 ± 3.6 | 22.8 ± 4.1 | 24.5 ± 4.3 | 20.7 ± 3.8 |
| Control group | 9.8 ± 2.9 | 14.2 ± 3.2 | 15.8 ± 3.4 | 12.9 ± 2.9 | |
| t value | 7.542 | 9.682 | 9.347 | 9.871 | |
| P value* | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Pore area improvement rate (%) | Study group | 12.3 ± 2.9 | 18.6 ± 3.7 | 20.1 ± 4.0 | 16.8 ± 3.5 |
| Control group | 7.6 ± 2.2 | 11.4 ± 2.8 | 12.9 ± 3.1 | 10.2 ± 2.6 | |
| t value | 8.014 | 9.254 | 8.763 | 9.135 | |
| P value* | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Pore density improvement rate (%) | Study group | 11.8 ± 2.7 | 17.2 ± 3.4 | 18.9 ± 3.8 | 15.4 ± 3.2 |
| Control group | 7.1 ± 2.1 | 10.6 ± 2.5 | 12.3 ± 2.9 | 9.7 ± 2.4 | |
| t value | 8.536 | 9.417 | 8.294 | 8.962 | |
| P value* | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Fine line depth improvement rate (%) | Study group | 18.7 ± 4.0 | 26.3 ± 4.5 | 28.7 ± 4.8 | 23.9 ± 4.1 |
| Control group | 11.2 ± 3.1 | 16.8 ± 3.6 | 18.4 ± 3.9 | 14.7 ± 3.2 | |
| t value | 9.241 | 10.386 | 10.147 | 10.753 | |
| P value* | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Texture uniformity improvement rate (%) | Study group | 14.6 ± 3.3 | 21.4 ± 3.9 | 23.6 ± 4.2 | 19.3 ± 3.6 |
| Control group | 9.1 ± 2.6 | 13.7 ± 3.1 | 15.2 ± 3.3 | 12.1 ± 2.8 | |
| t value | 8.195 | 9.572 | 9.684 | 9.815 | |
| P value* | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
P values corrected by Bonferroni method.