Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 20;14:1866750. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2026.1866750

TABLE 4.

Comparison of skin texture improvement assessment results between two groups.

Indicator Group 1 Month post-treatment 3 Months post-treatment 6 Months post-treatment 12 Months post-treatment
Skin roughness index improvement rate (%) Study group 15.2 ± 3.6 22.8 ± 4.1 24.5 ± 4.3 20.7 ± 3.8
Control group 9.8 ± 2.9 14.2 ± 3.2 15.8 ± 3.4 12.9 ± 2.9
t value 7.542 9.682 9.347 9.871
P value* <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Pore area improvement rate (%) Study group 12.3 ± 2.9 18.6 ± 3.7 20.1 ± 4.0 16.8 ± 3.5
Control group 7.6 ± 2.2 11.4 ± 2.8 12.9 ± 3.1 10.2 ± 2.6
t value 8.014 9.254 8.763 9.135
P value* <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Pore density improvement rate (%) Study group 11.8 ± 2.7 17.2 ± 3.4 18.9 ± 3.8 15.4 ± 3.2
Control group 7.1 ± 2.1 10.6 ± 2.5 12.3 ± 2.9 9.7 ± 2.4
t value 8.536 9.417 8.294 8.962
P value* <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Fine line depth improvement rate (%) Study group 18.7 ± 4.0 26.3 ± 4.5 28.7 ± 4.8 23.9 ± 4.1
Control group 11.2 ± 3.1 16.8 ± 3.6 18.4 ± 3.9 14.7 ± 3.2
t value 9.241 10.386 10.147 10.753
P value* <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Texture uniformity improvement rate (%) Study group 14.6 ± 3.3 21.4 ± 3.9 23.6 ± 4.2 19.3 ± 3.6
Control group 9.1 ± 2.6 13.7 ± 3.1 15.2 ± 3.3 12.1 ± 2.8
t value 8.195 9.572 9.684 9.815
P value* <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

P values corrected by Bonferroni method.