Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 3;16(39):44470–44478. doi: 10.1039/d6ra03667h

Table 1. Comparison of the developed sensor with other reported fluorescence-based sensors for bisphenol A detection.

Sensor platform/materials Detection strategy Linear range LOD Tested matrices Reference
BPA-aptamer system Fluorescence 0–1300 µM 32 nM Tap water 43
Au-Fe alloy nanoparticles/horseradish peroxidase Colorimetry 1.10–70.1 µM 0.58 µM Polycarbonate plastic samples 44
Laccase enzyme/ABTS/polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel beads Colorimetry 1.0–10.0 µM 0.5 µM Model phenolic solutions 45
Magnetic particles and quantum dots/immunochromatographic test strip Fluorescence/lateral flow immunoassay 0.3–100 µg mL−1 0.3 ng mL−1 Drinking and natural water 24
UCNPs/tetramethylrhodamine Fluorescence (FRET) 0.1–25 ng mL−1 0.05 ng mL−1 Tap water, river water, disposable paper cup water 25
Zinc-based porphyrin metal–organic framework Fluorescence quenching 0.050–20 nM 0.902 nM Polycarbonate food packaging films 26
MIP chips Colorimetry 5–25 µM 5 µM Wastewater 39
AgNP-MIP chips Fluorescence (MEF) 0.1 nM–25 µM 0.1 nM Wastewater This work