Skip to main content
. 2026 May 28;26:387. doi: 10.1186/s12905-026-04579-9

Table 3.

Determinants of occurrence of peritoneal adhesions in the midline regions

Factor Presence of adhesions in the midline RR (95% CI) *p-value
No (n = 16) Yes (n = 80)
Previous Peritoneal surgery CRR = 10.371
 No (n = 25) 11 (44.0%) 14 (56.0%) ARR = 10.279 < 0.001
 Yes (n = 71) 5 (7.0%) 66 (93.0%) 3.111–34.579
Previous abortion
 No (n = 51) 10 (19.6%) 41 (80.4%) NS 0.434
 Yes (n = 45) 6 (13.3%) 39 (86.7%)
Previous surgery involving uterus and adnexa (n = 71)
 No (n = 17) 5 (29.4%) 12 (70.6%) NS 0.997
 Yes (n = 54) 0(0) 54 (100%)
Incision type (n = 71)
 Non midline (n = 45) 5 (11.1%) 40 (88.9%) NS 0.998
 Midline (n = 26) 0(0) 26 (100%)
BMI
 <25 kg/m² (n = 41) 9 (22.0%) 32 (78.0%) NS 0.272
 ≥25 kg/m² (n = 55) 7 (12.7%) 48 (87.3%)
Pre-operative diagnosis/indication
 Non-inflammatory (n = 64) 10 (15.6%) 54 (84.4%) NS 0.998
 Inflammatory (n = 32) 6 (18.8%) 26 (81.2%)
aMain findings at laparoscopy Adhesion in the midline
No (n = 12) Yes (n = 46)
 Non-inflammatory (n = 32) 7 (21.9%) 25 (78.1%) NS 0.666
 Inflammatory (n = 26) 5 (19.2%) 21 (80.8%)

*Multivariable logistic regression statistics

a n=38 individuals with ‘adhesions’ as only finding were not classified into inflammatory/non-inflammatory