TABLE 1.
Probe name | Designationb | Sequence (5′-3′) | Target rRNA | Specificity | % FAc | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ctaenio998 | S-S-Ctaenio-998-a-A-18 | CTCTCTCGTCTTCTATGG | 16S | C. taeniospiralis 51k | 60 | This study |
Ctaenio129 | S-S-Ctaenio-129-a-A-18 | CCCTCTGTACGGCAGATT | 16S | C. taeniospiralis 51k | 70 | This study |
Ctaenio86 | S-S-Ctaenio-86-a-A-18 | GAAAGTGGAAGTCGAACC | 16S | C. taeniospiralis 51k | ND | This study |
EUB338 | GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT | 16S | Almost all bacteria | 0-50 | 3 | |
EUB338-II | GCAGCCACCCGTAGGTGT | 16S | Planctomycetales | 0-50 | 8 | |
EUB338-III | GCTGCCACCCGTAGGTGT | 16S | Verrucomicrobiales | 0-50 | 8 | |
ALF1B | CGTTCGYTCTGAGCCAG | 16S | Alphaproteobacteria | 20 | 28 | |
BET42a | GCCTTCCCACTTCGTTT | 23S | Betaproteobacteria | 35 | 28 | |
GAM42a | GCCTTCCCACATCGTTT | 23S | Gammaproteobacteria | 35 | 28 | |
CC23a | TTCCACTTTCCTCTCTCG | 16S | C. caryophilus | ND | 58 |
Difference alignments are available at probeBase (http://www.probebase.net).
According to Alm et al. (1).
Optimal formamide (FA) concentration in the hybridization buffer. ND, not determined.