Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 7;40:e054. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2026.vol40.054

Table 2. Assessment of the risk of bias in cross-sectional studies.

Author (Year) JBI for analytical cross-sectional studies Additional comments, if applicable
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
Alanzi et al. (2025) 37 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  
Al-Swaje et al. (2019) 46 No No No Yes NA NA Yes No Q1: It does not present inclusion and exclusion criteria. Q2: The study participants are not described in detail, and the time period was not clear. Q3: The exposure was not measured in a valid and reliable way. Q8: The data were analyzed using only the Chi-square test.
Amaral et al. (2022) 21 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  
Meenapriya et al. (2021) 47 No No Yes Yes NA NA Yes No Q1: It does not present inclusion and exclusion criteria. Q2: The study participants are not described in detail. Q8: The data were analyzed using only the Chi-square test.
Güzel et al. (2025) 39 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes No Q8: No regression analyses were performed.
Marceliano; Gavião (2023) 40 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  
Pauli et al. (2024) 41 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  
Prado et al. (2025) 42 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  
Restrepo; Santamaría; Manrique (2021) 43 Yes Yes Yes Yes NA NA Yes Yes  
Silva et al. (2022) 44 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  
Yazıcıog˘ lu et al. (2021) 45 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  

Q1: Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?; Q2: Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?; Q3: Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?; Q4: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?; Q5: Were confounding factors identified?; Q6: Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?; Q7: Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?; Q8:Was appropriate statistical analysis used?. NA: Not applicable.