Table 4.

Adjusted Odds Ratios of Selected Demographic Covariates and Sexual (Model 1) and Zoonotic (Model 2) Risk Scores. Wald p-values less than 0.05 are identified in bold, as are those point estimates considered significant

Table 4. long description.

MODEL 1 SEX RISK reactive(x) = age_cat + sex + loc + popcohort + sex_risk	aOR	Lower CI	Upper CI	WALD p-value
	n = 1728				Type 3 Wald	p-value
Age					age_cat2	0.0009
18–24	REF				sex	0.2653
25–34	0.866	0.426	1.762	0.6911	location	0.4540
35–44	1.091	0.437	2.726	0.8513	popcohort	0.6418
45–54	3.923	1.423	10.818	0.0083	sex_risk	0.4881
55+	7.774	2.368	25.521	0.0007
Sex
Male	REF
Female	0.714	0.296	1.725	0.454
Urban center
Kinshasa	REF
Goma	1.158	0.624	2.149	0.6418
Population cohort
At risk population	REF
MSM	0.451	0.192	1.060	0.0677
MSM and sex worker	0.638	0.163	2.505	0.5195
Sex worker	0.500	0.158	1.587	0.2396
5-Point sex risk (Multiple partners in three weeks, QPQ Sex, Total partner count > median, no condom use, non-monogamous/no primary partner)
0	REF
1	0.326	0.105	1.010	0.0520
2	0.677	0.241	1.898	0.4580
3	0.542	0.175	1.672	0.2863
4	0.623	0.177	2.196	0.4620
5	0.593	0.102	3.464	0.5619

Note: Wald p-values less than 0.05 are identified in bold, as are those point estimates considered significant.