Table 1 .
Characteristics of population-based and individual-based approaches
| Approach | ||
|---|---|---|
| Population based | Individual based | |
| Lifetime fitness | Only possible for semelparous species | Iteroparous and semelparous species |
| Age | Often impossible or poorly accurate. Where possible, estimated indirectly from biomarkers | Directly estimated in all cases |
| Social network | Not possible | Measurable |
| Resource distribution and allocation | Partially possible if different genotypes can be associated to different allocation strategies | Measurable |
| Phenotypic plasticity | Changes in population means and variances. Individual plasticity not measurable (often lower than the population range) | Changes in population and individual means and variances |
| Repeatability | Only for population averages | Measurable |
| Interstage effects | Population level effects. Prone to ecological fallacy | Measurable |
| Intergenerational effects | Population level effects. Prone to ecological fallacy | Measurable |
| Behaviour | General patterns. Prone to ecological fallacy | Animal personalities and behavioural syndromes |
| Physiology | General patterns. Prone to ecological fallacy | Within-individual dynamics |
| Cost and workload | Relatively low | High |
| Versatility | Low | High |
Comparison of measurable traits and effects between population-based and individual-based approaches on parasite-related research