Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 8;26:1040. doi: 10.1186/s12877-026-07733-y

Table 2.

Associations of LTPA with grip strength: continuous and tertile-based analyses

Panel A. LTPA as a continuous variable (per 60 min/week increase; n = 418)
Model β (kg) 95% CI P value
Crude 0.155 0.056 to 0.253 0.002
Model 1 0.067 0.008 to 0.125 0.025
Model 2 0.059 0.002 to 0.116 0.044
Model 3 0.064 0.009 to 0.120 0.023
Panel B. LTPA tertiles (reference: T1 ≤ 0 min/wk; n = 418)
Model T2 vs. T1, β (95% CI) P value T3 vs. T1, β (95% CI) P value P for trend
Crude 0.843 (-1.453 to 3.139) 0.471 1.652 (-0.466 to 3.770) 0.126 0.13
Model 1 0.650 (-0.999 to 2.300) 0.439 0.639 (-0.743 to 2.020) 0.364 0.385
Model 2 0.485 (-1.151 to 2.121) 0.56 0.473 (-0.910 to 1.856) 0.502 0.522
Model 3 0.679 (-1.010 to 2.368) 0.43 0.684 (-0.692 to 2.060) 0.329 0.35

Notes: Values are regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals from ordinary least squares regression with HC3 robust standard errors

Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex

Model 2 was additionally adjusted for education, marital status, living arrangement, and residence

Model 3 was further adjusted for sleep duration, current smoking, current drinking, number of chronic diseases, fall risk score, and cognitive screening score