| Physical properties |
Melting point |
<30 °C |
Avoid solidification; no solvent addition |
66
|
| Boiling point |
>300 °C |
Low vapour pressure enables easier H2 purification |
46
|
| Viscosity |
Low dynamic viscosity |
Facilitates pumping and infrastructure compatibility |
46
|
| Storage capacity |
Gravimetric capacity |
> 6 wt% (≥5 wt% at tank system level) |
Competitive hydrogen density |
11, 66 and 67
|
| Volumetric capacity |
>56 kgH2 m−3
|
Comparable to compressed hydrogen storage |
66
|
| Energy density |
Volumetric energy density |
>1.6 MWh m−3 (LHV basis) |
Competitive with liquid fuels |
11 and 67
|
| Thermodynamics |
Hydrogen binding enthalpy |
30–50 kJ molH2−1 (42–54 kJ mol−1 acceptable range) |
Enables dehydrogenation < 200 °C at ∼1 bar |
66
|
| Energy efficiency |
Dehydrogenation energy demand |
≤ 10 kWh per kg H2 (thermal) |
Techno-economic competitiveness |
11 and 67
|
| Reaction kinetics |
Dehydrogenation rate |
>3 gH2 g−1 catalyst/min |
Industrially viable hydrogen release rate |
11 and 67
|
| Selectivity |
Conversion/selectivity |
>90% conversion; > 99.8% selectivity |
Minimise side reactions and degradation |
11 and 67
|
| Durability |
Performance degradation |
<0.01% per cycle |
Long service life; reduced replacement cost |
11 and 67
|
| Compatibility |
Impurity tolerance |
Up to 20% impurities in H2 feed |
Compatible with mixed gas hydrogenation streams |
11 and 67
|
| Economics |
Production cost |
Low-cost, scalable synthesis |
Essential for large-scale deployment |
46
|
| Infrastructure |
Logistics compatibility |
Compatible with existing fuel infrastructure |
Reduces CAPEX |
66
|
| Safety & environment |
Toxicity |
Non-toxic, non-hazardous |
Must comply with transport and environmental regulations |
46
|