Table 3.
Relative abundance of soil microbial communities at the phylum level.
| Microbial species | Phylum | LS | FX | HJ | P_value (FX-LS) | P_value (FX-HJ) | P_value (LS-HJ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil bacteria | Chloroflexi | 37.14% | 39.90% | 37.11% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
| Acidobacteriota | 18.73% | 19.24% | 19.49% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Proteobacteria | 16.66% | 18.79% | 16.68% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Actinobacteriota | 13.79% | 9.29% | 12.77% | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| WPS-2 | 3.40% | 3.09% | 3.19% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Verrucomicrobiota | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.44% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Planctomycetota | 1.44% | 1.53% | 1.77% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| RCP2-54 | 1.01% | 1.25% | 1.34% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| GAL15 | 1.58% | 0.97% | 0.67% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Firmicutes | 0.56% | 1.45% | 0.57% | P < 0.05 | P < 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| others | 4.14% | 5.31% | 4.17% | ||||
| Soil fungi | Ascomycota | 26.74% | 39.69% | 36.75% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 |
| Mortierellomycota | 25.50% | 34.03% | 33.31% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Basidiomycota | 38.44% | 10.20% | 17.48% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| unclassified_k__Fungi | 5.16% | 9.93% | 8.68% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Rozellomycota | 3.00% | 4.87% | 2.17% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Mucoromycota | 0.56% | 0.23% | 0.70% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Chytridiomycota | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.35% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Kickxellomycota | 0.12% | 0.37% | 0.35% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Zoopagomycota | 0.09% | 0.16% | 0.10% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| Olpidiomycota | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.08% | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | |
| others | 0.01% | 0.12% | 0.03% |
LS, pure Cryptomeria fortunei; FX, pure Liquidambar formosana; HJ, mixed forests. Bold values indicate that this phylum differs significantly between the two stand types.