Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 31;13:1794774. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1794774

Table 5.

Misreporting within total population per physical activity level cut-offs.

Age group (years) EI: BMR Males EI: BMR Females
Plausible Below cut-off value 1.1 % misreporting Plausible Below cut-off value 1.1 % misreporting
Total 1.14 Plausible 680 (38.8%) −28.68 1.17 Plausible 677 (37.5%) −26.55
1.5–3 1.58 Plausible 3 (5.7%) 12.49 1.30 Plausible 9 (17.4%) −7.08
4–10 1.82 Plausible 10 (6.5%) 15.39 1.31 Plausible 24 (15.6%) −16.47
11–14 1.14 Plausible 42 (46.5%) −34.95 1.18 Plausible 29 (37.2%) −32.44
15–18 1.05 Implausible 41 (54.0%) −40.17 1.09 Plausible 37 (45.8%) −37.60
19–64 1.16 Plausible 461 (43.0%) −28.85 1.16 Plausible 462 (42.7%) −29.00
65–74 1.16 Plausible 75 (40.0%) −28.83 1.17 Plausible 80 (37.7%) −28.11
75 + 1.11 Plausible 47 (42.6%) −31.81 1.20 Plausible 36 (24.7%) −26.33

All data presented as median. EI: BMR = ratio of reported energy intake (EI) to estimated Basal metabolic rate (BMR), used to assess dietary reporting plausibility. A cut-off value of <1.1 (based on the Goldberg method) was used to indicate under-reporting. Estimated energy requirements were calculated as BMR x physical activity level (PAL), using the age appropriate BMR equations and assumed PAL values. Physical activity level set for each age category: 0–3 y, 1.40; 3–10 y, 1.58; 10–18 y, 1.75; 18+, 1.63. Percentage misreporting (% misreporting) reflects the median percentage difference between reported energy intake (EI) and estimated energy requirements (EER) calculated as: (Ei-EER)/EER × 100. Negative values indicate under-reporting of energy intake.