Table 2.

Regressing parents’ empathic accuracy on intrapersonal ER strategy use in response to negative affect: Within-person level APIM results (N_dyads = 112)

	A. Maladaptive ER strategies						B. Adaptive ER strategies
	β	SE	df	t	CI	f 2	β	SE	df	t	CI	f 2
Intercept	−0.02	0.03	4368	−0.79	−0.08, 0.03	<.001	−0.02	0.03	4368	−0.64	−0.07, 0.03	<.001
Role1	0.00	0.02	108	0.28	−0.03, 0.04	<.001	0.01	0.01	108	0.55	−0.02, 0.04	<.001
Lagged EA	0.05	0.02	4368	3.14 **	0.02, 0.09	.006	0.15	0.02	4368	7.06 ***	0.11, 0.19	.003
Mean EA	1.01	0.02	108	49.90 ***	0.97, 1.05	.607	1.01	0.02	108	57.07 ***	0.97, 1.04	.663
Mean Perceiver’s ER	−0.00	0.01	108	−0.11	−0.03, 0.02	<.001	−0.00	0.01	108	−0.34	−0.03, 0.02	<.001
Mean Target’s ER	0.01	0.01	108	0.86	−0.01, 0.03	<.001	0.01	0.01	108	0.65	−0.01, 0.03	<.001
Perceiver’s daily ER	−0.07	0.03	4368	−2.44 *	−0.13, −0.01	.002	0.02	0.03	4368	0.91	−0.03, 0.08	<.001
Target’s daily ER	−0.01	0.03	4368	−0.34	−0.06, 0.04	<.001	0.03	0.03	4368	1.00	−0.03, 0.09	<.001
Role × Perceiver’s daily ER	0.01	0.04	4368	0.14	−0.07, 0.08	< 0	−0.02	0.03	4368	−0.44	−0.08, 0.05	<.001
Role × Target’s daily ER	−0.01	0.03	4368	−0.38	−0.07, 0.05	< 0	−0.07	0.04	4368	−1.83	−0.14, 0.00	<.001

Note. EA = empathic accuracy; ER = emotion regulation.

¹Role is coded “0” for parent and “1” for adolescent. Therefore, default estimates are those in which parents are the targets and the associated outcome is theirs.

^*p < .05;

^**p < .01,

^***p < .001.