Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 28;43(7):e215433. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2025-215433

Table 2. Self-reported perceptions of access, awareness and satisfaction with emergency care services among adult village residents before and after implementation of the village emergency care model.

Indicator Baseline, n=191 n(%) Postintervention, n=270 n(%) χ² P value
Availability of emergency services 117 (61.0) 228 (84.4) 22.47 <0.001
Acceptability of emergency care 172 (90.0) 263 (97.4) 9.03 0.003
Affordability of emergency services 17 (9.0) 138 (51.1) 56.91 <0.001
Physical accessibility of services 96 (50.3) 266 (98.6) 168.32 <0.001
Availability of essential medicines 120 (62.8) 245 (90.7) 35.11 <0.001
Diagnostic services readily available 92 (48.2) 223 (82.6) 46.27 <0.001
24-hour service availability at facility 19 (10.1) 270 (100.0) 385.30 <0.001
Awareness of emergency services 172 (90.1) 262 (97.0) 9.03 0.003
Satisfaction with emergency services 23 (12.0) 239 (88.5) 187.60 <0.001

Values are number (%) unless otherwise stated.

Indicators reflect self-reported perceptions of access domains adapted from the Penchansky and Thomas framework.

Baseline survey conducted prior to implementation of the village emergency care model; postintervention survey conducted after implementation.

Χ² tests used for all categorical comparisons